26 June 2023 Dearborn County Plan Commission Meeting Notes

 26 June 2023 Dearborn County Plan Commission Meeting Notes

Present: Dennis Kraus, Jr., Chairman, Russell Beiersdorfer, Mark Lehman, Joe Vogel, Jake Hoog, Dan Lansing, Jim Thatcher, and Eric Lang

ABSENT: Jeff Hermesch

Also Present:  Nicole Daily, Zoning Administrator, and Andy Baudendistel, Attorney.

Baudendistel read the Title VI statement as legally required.

ACTION ON MINUTES Minutes from May 22nd meeting were approved with correction of Stenger’s comments changing “is” to “as” on page 5 from Beiersdorfer regarding storm water requirements in major subdivision. 

OLD BUSINESS: none

NEW BUSINESS:

Request: Zone Map Amendment from Residential to Local Business (B1) Applicant/Owner: Maxwell / Michael and Malisa Rauen Site Location: 24564 & 24606 Stateline Road Parcel: #15-01-34-104-007.001-006 Township: Harrison Size: 3.88 acres Zoning: Residential 

Nicole Daily presented. Owner wanting to rezone portions of the property that are residential to B-1. 0.75 acre was zoned B-1 in June 1980. There was a nursery business there also. Revised plan was submitted and staff had concern with access points. It’s being considered for a standalone Skyline Restaurant. Tech review was please with getting rid of some of the 6 access points and narrowing it down to 2. They would limit the access into the nursery once the Skyline is in place. The pond on the property is shared by residential properties- so will look at that in the permitting process.The maps of the area show the current access points. There is residential structure there also where the proposed Skyline will go. Friendship State Bank has a piece near here too. Daily also posted the criteria for a zone change recommendation to the commissioners. 

Lehman asked about the lot they had changed in 2022 and they had put a condition on the access points at that time. They have some issues with how to line up the access points with the bank - which has not been built yet. They are in the concept stage. They will have to come back to get those changed to the board. Friendship could get 2 access possibly on Sneakville to alleviate the issue on Stateline. 

38 letters sent out- and 6 were unclaimed. 2 were unclaimed as of 6/23. Speed limits change right at this property. Todd Listerman said they may do a study on that to push the speed limit line further towards N Dearborn. He wouldn’t so anything until things were built out there.

Jeff Lyness- represented Maxwell for the owners. He discussed the number of businesses in the area now and things are tightened up over time. The owner is willing to commit over the development of the property to fix  accesses. But they do want to keep it open to the nursery. They need large access to the barn in the back.. Trailers need to get back there for trees etc. They are willing to change back to one access on nursery if that business ceases to exist in the future. They are eliminating 2 curb cuts where the Skyline is - and it will have one access.  Continued discussion about matching up with Frienship. Lyness stressed that it was not fair to stipulate the access across from Friendship as a condition of the rezone. He thinks it should be part of the process of the development stage when they go thru tech review. The problem is the pre-existing non- conforming conditions. Drainage from Skyline will not go into the current pond. 

PUBLIC COMMENT Opened 

Kevin Herscbom - 24545 Park Place Estates- lives adjoining it and he doesn’t want to have it there in his back yard- Noise from the drive thru speakers an issue. Has $60k in his back yard 

Doug Brown 24563 Park Place-   Now we will have grease trap smell and cars all ion their back yard space. 

Pulled up map- Park Board owns a space between the properties. It does not stop the noise per the neighbors. They can hear the gas station music too. 

Closed Public Discussion

Board members: Mark Lehman- said it has business around it and it meets the requirements for section 540 plus it is in character. There is a lot of wooded area on the back side. The topography of the park space shouldn’t be developed per Eric Lang.

Lehman motioned for a FAVORABLE Recommendation with conditions that detention flow doesn’t go into exiting pond and if the north landscape business changes that the entrances be reduced to one. Also citing section 540 findings of facts. Beiersdorfer 2nded. Approved  with Thatcher Abstaining as usual citing he votes at the Commissioners Meeting. July 18th meeting will be on the Commissioners Meeting Agenda. 

ADMINISTRATIVE: started at 7:15 PM

DEARBORN COUNTY PROPOSED ZONING TEXT CHANGES – To review and discuss proposed ordinance amendments and updates to the Dearborn County Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, specifically with respect to the text(s) of: Articles 9 and 10, regarding Agricultural and Residential Zoning Districts; Article 25, regarding General Standards and new Use Development Standards; Article 27, regarding Definitions.

Daily put a large amount of material in the board packets. They will start with Kelso Township because of the petitions received and the larger number of people from there present. She said she tried to put their requests into the map to show what the petitioners were asking for. This is area up around the high school and Dogridge Rd, Sawmill, SR 46 etc. She stressed how long they have been working in these maps. The map that was shown was the draft map. We did not get to see her map of what the petitioners were asking for. 

Lang was talking about Ag Homestead being what we really have now as Ag. [NOTE: That is incorrect.]

Beiersdorfer said that Ag Homestead does not allow CAFOs (confined feeder operations) but Ag will allow them. He also said he does not see that happening as we don’t have lots big enough in Ag to meet the setbacks for one. So this should not be a problem in Dearborn County. 

Certified surveys can be done on a property each year currently. 

Daily said they wanted to be more conscious of preserving Ag, Rather than being only pro development. There are a few R3s that are existing. There are areas of proposed R2  on the new maps. 

Lehman said they were also trying to eliminate all the pre-existing non-conforming uses too. ( Grandfathered?)

Since 1965 we have had 1 Ag and 1 R district. [NOTE: There needed to be R2 and R3 for denser residential developments. These densities are currently conditional uses in an R1. ]

There are different ideas and concepts like tiny homes that needed to be included in the texts.

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Steve Perrine - Could you just run down the list of what you can’t do in Ag Homestead that you can do in Ag. - Answer- They couldn’t do that easily tonight. Will try to get that to people after that if you sign up email.  [NOTE: That should be something they fleshed out when they created the zone. Ag Homestead looks a lot like R1 when you see the purposes and uses. The difference is that it is next to Ag ???]

Greg Hyland- 258 acres and 160 on Hyland and 98 at end of Dogridge. Thanked Nicole for helping him understand zoning. My road has a one lane bridge with a 16 ton limit.  When you change the zone you facilitate more development. You should get infrastructure up and then talk about changes.

Mark Hall- at the end of Dogridge where I was raised. 2 farms there where my family (kids) lives and a business near SR 46. He lives in New Alsace . He says there is no infrastructure  on Dogridge. Most people here are on Ennis, Dogridge, Hyland, and Kraus. We want to get this area to stay strong Ag. Four signs and then petitions brought these people here. Maps and definitions went out to the people for the petitions. They did not blindly sign. My son found out they want $150,000 to run water to his farm

Gary Denzler- Dogridge Rd- Talked to 17 different residents in our area roads and they did not want this. 

Robert Herth- Look at the subdivision that is by the high school. There is not enough density to get the turn lanes in at Trojan. Beneker Rd could have too much traffic for my farm equipment. Agree- we have to do infrastructure first - not the other way around. Beneker Rd is not big enough for 2 way traffic. Per Kraus Jr,

Gregory Hyland- thanked the board and Nicole  for the process. Two more points. Soils and conservation. We have best Oak trees in the country. Kelso is not growing as fast as the other areas. That Ag H buffer is wider than it needs to be. 

Debra Petra- Your Township- wondered about what the change on Burzelbach Rd is? Subdivision? Road is narrow. Answer- this was a request from someone to change their zone. (This was probably Lyness property there)

Josh Holland- Sparta- When Mark left- Nicole came in- what changes were made? Answer: Daily- she used the mapping program to get it more exact than the conceptual ones we began with. There were no drastic changes. She had them in the system before he left the dept. 

Greg Whitaker- Kraus Rd- speaking on behalf of all the yellow- We don’t want that. The signs did work. We’d like to keep it a farm. There is no sewage or water on Kraus Rd. No yellow line on the rad either per Kraus Jr. There is no sewer on a lot of Hyland either.

Karen Herth- Kelso- Work at they BP in St, Leon. It’s a great town to stop and visit. They want affordable housing. Just like the affordable housing that you can’t afford down on SR 1 that Casey is building. We saved all our life to have our farm. You want to build apts- $1200 a month to live in.  Answer- Kraus Jr said this board doesn’t necessarily want to develop. Wuestefeld has a subdivision. Singers have a small one. Old Hickory is going to be divided. People selling will open development sometimes.

Rob Herth- Colors are driving development into the area.  

Schools are the interstate will drive development per Daily.

Rob Herth- Kraus asked his reasons for not wanting it to be residential. He discussed issues with lifestyle and issues with people who move in expecting more urban amenities, etc.  I missed some of his details here)

Mr Lamping sp ? - people did not know about these meetings. Newspaper and the Beacon. We’ve never received any letter. The means you are using to notify are not working.

The people moved out here for a reason. We like it that way. We drive to get our supplies. Developers have a lot of money. Businesses don’t help as they get abatements. What is the purpose of changing zoning?  ANSWER - cannot use the same rules as 60 years ago. We need to update. 

Mrs Whitaker- We are Ag and now you want it to be R. Currently living on her grandparents. Infrastructure is not there. Traffic is terrible when school lets out, More will make it worse. 

Melissa Miller- When were we going to be notified that we were going to R from Ag. I went to the EC meeting and signed up for emails. No notifications till today when se heard about this meeting. Answer- Kraus gave her background on why they did it. We were not planning on making every one in the  county. Too expensive.

Greg Hyland - again- I just want to read the descriptions of Ag and Ag homestead.  This showed clearly that the Ag is for heavy use Ag and no urbanization while Ag Homestead is for low density development near Ag. [NOTE:The actual purpose of each district is clearly stated in the first paragraph of the text. ]

Jenny Kirchner- Ennis Rd- Where can we find them same kind of data and review for these zoning changes that you used at the earlier zone change request in Bright.. Answer-Kraus Jr. there is not anything like that planned.  Kirchner- I am an engineer- having data to show why this change is being proposed. Answer Lang- we had a list of criteria like sewer, water, etc and what was high or lower priority. There were 8-9 things like this. 

Steve Perrine- Lawrenceburg Township- would still like to keep me in Ag rather than Ag Homestead. 

Beiersdorfer grew up in Peach Grove Ohio now where 74 and 275 meet. I hate to say it- St Leon is like a sleeping giant. Our board makes sure infrastructure is going to go in at the developers expense. [NOTE: This is generally the rule, and the developers build the roads to county specs. After roads are accepted into the county road  inventory, the taxpayers will pay for repaving as needed.]

Harland Burlage- So what about housing TIFs? Answer- there is none in the unincorporated  county. (Big pause) [NOTE: The Crossings at Tanners Creek on SR 1 in Greendale is a HOTIF. (Housing Opportunity Tax Incremental Financing. Some of the other cities and towns are also talking about setting one up. It’s apparent that the infrastructure may not be entirely at the developer’s expense in these cases. In fact it cuts into the taxes that would go to the schools and other services that they housing development taxes should be paying for.]

Jeff Stenger- (former chairman of Plan Commission and former county surveyor) concerned about minor subdivisions missing from the Ag zone. Also asked about the 150 versus 200 ft frontage for Ag and burning up the farm land. [NOTE: This is one are that the AG zone changed in this proposed text. There are ways around this- but it seems that Ag is the only zone where a minor subdivision is NOT allowed in the proposed texts. This mistake could be easily corrected to keep that option open for those families that wish to put succession plans in place BEFORE death to assure estate settlements are done according to their wishes.  In one case for a map change, there is a request to go from Ag to Ag homestead just to get this minor division option.] 

Josh Holland - Sparta- spoke again regarding his area- and likes what they are looking at as much better than what they had previously.

Close Public Discussion.

No Decisions.

Nicole said they will have a case next month so that will be at the beginning of the meeting. Then we can continue this discussion and the other townships.

 

July 24th is next meeting at 6 PM.

Meeting adjourned at  9:15 PM

Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township

FOOF FOR THOUGHT

Gender: The Triumph of Error



by Mark Franke

reprinted with permission of IPR

How did we ever get to this point? And so quickly?

I routinely try to ignore national news channels but admit to scanning a daily feed of headlines. What I am seeing beggars credulity. One of the top news stories is gender affirmation/gender reassignment/gender whatever issues among young children. Young children?

The battle lines are clearly demarcated. In numerous locales parents are pitted against teachers and school administrators over what the children will be taught and whether parents should be kept in the dark. This is not a condemnation of all schools and all teachers, but there are way too many incidents to dismiss it as an aberration. At least I know of no such controversy in my corner of Indiana and my conceit is that sanity will continue to reign in the Midwest.

So why is this question even on the table? Whose children are they?

The home has been the structural foundation of our civilization and most others. Parents are the pillars of the home with the nurturing function incumbent in such a role. What gratifies parents more than watching the young persons they love most mature into responsible adults?

I hardly believe that all parents are perfect; I certainly have not been. Yet each parenting failure can lead to a useful lesson for both parent and child. No one wants to make the same mistakes his parents made during his childhood. We strive to be better grandparents than we were parents. Such is the strength and weakness of human nature, when tempered by an attitude of forgiveness.

Given that, how much influence and control do we as parents wish to default to the state and its school system?

I like the response of Gomez Addams from “The Addams Family” television show to the truant officer’s complaint that his children were not in school. “Ridiculous. Why have children just to get rid of them? I’m opposed to the whole nonsense.”

The significant increase in home-schooling and enrollment in private and parochial schools suggests that there are a lot of Gomez Addamses out there. Parents are doing what Americans do when they disagree with prevailing conditions; they vote with their feet.

Who could have foreseen this?

A 19th-century theologian, Charles Porterfield Krauth, advanced a theory of how doctrinal error enters the church. It is a three-stage process. First, the error simply asks to be tolerated, a belief or practice held in private but free of condemnation or persecution by the orthodox. Once toleration is established, the error demands equality, viewed as equally valid and as true as orthodox doctrine. Finally, error supererogates a position of superiority, in which it condemns and persecutes that which has been accepted doctrine for centuries.

Notice how everything has been stood on its head. Wrong is right and right is wrong.

It is not simply a matter of denying all universal truth; it is a newly established universal truth that brooks no questioning. The putative persecuted have become the persecutors. Welcome to our brave new world where natural law is not only irrelevant, it is proscribed from the public square.

Krauth’s interest was doctrinal, reflective of the church’s confession. He has proven right as nearly all fundamental Christian doctrine has become challengeable if it fails muster with our upside-down cultural norms. The profane trumps the sacred.

Disney’s film “Fantasia” has a wonderful illustration of how this relationship is supposed to work in its segment set to “Night on Bald Mountain.” The animation behind the orchestral music shows all sorts of demons running amok in the world at least until a church bell rings and a procession of the faithful walk to worship by candlelight. The demons decamp.

It is now “Fantasia” in reverse. Krauth never could have envisioned how his theory would dominate secular culture less than two centuries later. My parents, teenagers during the Depression, could not have seen this coming. I can scarcely credit it myself, especially given the warp speed of this moral inversion. It goes way beyond Hegel’s dialectic. No synthesis has evolved. Instead antithesis becomes thesis and accepts no challenges. The dialectic door is slammed shut. Krauth eclipses Hegel.

So I ask the question again? Whose children are they? How can anyone argue that the state’s interest supersedes the rights . . . and duties . . . of parents? Those who do must live in the world of “Animal Farm” or “The Village of the Damned” where children are controlled by others than their parents. Parents are irrelevant and even potential obstructionists if they were to be allowed influence with their own children.

We are in danger of no longer living in the “land of the free.” It’s time to remember that we also live in the “home of the brave” and just say no to this statist, anti-liberty trend. Our children and grandchildren deserve nothing less from us.

Mark Franke, M.B.A., an adjunct scholar of the Indiana Policy Review and its book reviewer, is formerly an associate vice-chancellor at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne.

The Indiana Policy Review Foundation is a nonprofit education foundation focused on state and municipal issues. It is free of outside control by any individual, organization or group. It exists solely to conduct and distribute research on Indiana issues. Opinions expressed in signed articles do not necessarily represent the views of the editors, the Indiana Policy Review Foundation, or its board of directors. Nothing in this journal, whether in print or pixels, is an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill or influence the election of any candidate.

AGENDA June 26th Dearborn County Plan Commission Meeting

Please Note- The maps are not able to be added to the blog. 

Below is an email explaining how the meeting will proceed, followed by the agenda.

Dear Citizen:

 

Attached area a couple of things.

 

1. The agenda for the meeting scheduled for Monday at 6:00pm
2. The maps that have been delivered to the Board members that reflect the original staff presented maps, and changes to certain areas discussed during several meetings.

 

There are also petitions that we delivered to the office and which have been delivered to the Board members.  I don’t have this for this email but will be discussed at the meeting.

 

Please be aware that there will be a Zone Map Amendment case that will be heard first, before the Board will begin to discuss the proposed zone map changes that we have been working on with the zoning ordinance text changes for the last three years.

 

If anyone has any questions please feel free to contact me.

 

Sincerely,

 

Nicole Daily

Director of Planning and Zoning

Floodplain Administrator

ndaily@dearborncounty.in.gov

T:  812-537-8821  |   F:  812-532-2029

Dearborn County Government Center

Dearborn County Planning and Zoning Department

165 Mary Street

Lawrenceburg, IN 47025

Website: www.dearborncounty.org/planning

 

 PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA

 Monday, June 26, 2023 6:00 P.M.

 *Location: Henry Dearborn Meeting Room; Dearborn County Government Center 

A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 B. ROLL CALL 

C. ACTION ON MINUTES—May 22, 2023 

D. OLD BUSINESS – NONE TO BE RE-OPENED 

E. NEW BUSINESS – 1. Request: Zone Map Amendment from Residential to Local Business (B1) Applicant/Owner: Maxwell / Michael and Malisa Rauen Site Location: 24565 & 24606 Stateline Road Parcel: #15-01-34-104-007.001-006 Township: Harrison Size: 3.88 acres Zoning: Residential

 F. ADMINISTRATIVE  DEARBORN COUNTY PROPOSED ZONING TEXT CHANGES – To review and discuss proposed ordinance amendments and updates to the Dearborn County Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, specifically with respect to the text(s) of: Articles 9 and 10, regarding Agricultural and Residential Zoning Districts; Article 25, regarding General Standards and new Use Development Standards; Article 27, regarding Definitions.

20 JUNE 2023 DEARBORN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING NOTES

 20 JUNE 2023 DEARBORN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING NOTES

The following notes were taken from the recording of this meeting as I was unable to attend. CBM

Present: Jim Thatcher, President, Art Little, and Rick Probst

Also present: Connie Fromhold, Auditor, Andy Baudendistel, Attorney, and Sue Hayden, Administrator

TITLE VI STATEMENT FOR COMPLIANCE was read by Baudendistel as legally required.

OLD BUSINESS- none

NEW BUSINESS

Poll Workers Salaries - Gayle Pennington, Clerk of Courts- and Secretary of the Election Board. Coming to them to get their recommendation for salary increase. No raises since 2016-17. Totally electronic since then. They are trained. A lot are read to pass the baton to the next generation. Need to attract new worker. $150-200 per election in other counties. Inspectors get $150. We do $100 now. Wants it to be $150/election for the workers. $20 for training and $15 for meals is also in the budget currently. They work from 5 am to 6:30- 6:45 pm usually.We used to have 225 poll workers when there were more polling places. We have about 100 workers now per Rick Probst. The judges also get $150 and $200 for inspectors in this new 2024 budget request. The absentee ballot workers and traveling ones will be $100. Approved to go to Council for these amounts at budget request time.

Bid Award for 2023 Line Striping- County Engineer, Todd Listerman- had 2 bids - Ogelsby Construction from Norwalk OH was lowest bid. They also do state highways in WV. $172,876.50 is the bid amount-which is 9 1/2 cents per linear foot. We do 86 miles of our roads get striped. 1.8 million linear feet of line striping. Some of the roads last year were paved and the striping was included in the paving bid. It’s a little over $20,000 increase from last year. Approved.

Bridge 33 at bottom of Union Hill Rd. - Todd Listerman  presented -Have to relocate REMC utilities for $38,861.07 is max amount. This is an 80/20 project. Our cost is just under $8,000. The purchase price is a separate agreement. Approved. 

Zone Map Amendment- Director of Planning and Zoning, Nicole Daily

Ag to B-1 Local Business- Property on the Corner of SR1 and address is 7140 Hyland Rd- On May 22, 2023 PC met and passed a favorable recommendation with conditions- 1. Property owner puts landscaping on western and northern property lines within our buffer yard standards. 2.the property lights that exist or are added meet the current standards so it is not trespassing on other properties. Sewer is available. The local fire dept requested they remove the barriers in the  parking lot to prevent semi turn arounds. Property owner is here this evening. He met with owners regarding the lighting. Mixed use with commercial and industrial is the future land use options there. They have a 20 ft wide buffer line. She read the height and width of shrub and tree examples he can use. Photometric light measurements will be done for lighting if needed. .8 is the measurement along any property line. They may have to a adjust the LED lighting. Steve Naltner purchased the property. He said he called his neighbor who has knowledge of lighting to help with the lighting adjustment. He said they have done some changes to have the lighting facing the parking lot more and will do more if the neighbors think it is needed. Commissioners approved the Zone change to B-1.  

Ordinance to Change the Zoning Classification of the above property if approved. Commissioners signed the zone change ordinance also. 

Review of Interlocal Agreements for Dispatch Services- Baudendistel presented. They have not been adjusted since 2016-7 and the costs have increased. They met with Jared Teaney to get real number costs for the towns and cities. They are sending a letter to the towns and cities to not automatically renew. County has 37% of phone calls and 86% of budget costs now. There is a letter to be sent to get them to meet with us to discuss the new interlocal agreements and costs. $800,000 in new equipment is NOT included in these new costs for the cities and towns.This include 2 new people to be hired. They still take off the 911 costs. The money the county gets is taken off first before they figured the shared costs. Commissioners approved the letter to be sent so the automatic renewal will not happen. These fees are discussed. Letters will go out certified.  

 

ADMINISTRATOR – Sue Hayden

AUDITOR – Connie Fromhold  -Claims/Payroll and June 6th Minutes- Approved

Legal Rep for Tax Sales- $15/parcel and now $25 / parcel. Buchanan and Brugganschmidt retained for legal services. Approved. 

ATTORNEY – Andy Baudendistel- In process with house on Union Ridge being demolished. Judge Negangad approved the emergency process. They have to get a bid package for this. Opening the bids July 18th at the Commissioners meeting. All 5 respondents were served.The company that owns the property has been served thru their agent. This bid package has about 60 pages. When all is done then is goes to sheriff sale. We are more than likely not going to get the money back. 

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS- Probst- Tuesday is July 4 - meeting is Wednesday. Have a safe celebration. 

Little Have a great July 4 celebration. There is a house on Stateline House that is falling down too. It’s on the list for Bill Shelton coming in on July 5th meeting per Baudendistel.

LATE ARRIVAL INFORMATION- none

PUBLIC COMMENT- Ryan Johnson- person in long term recovery and former First Responder and President of One Voice and in Choices and wants to say that 20-25 beds of recovery housing are no longer available. He wants to know how the Opioid Settlement money we get is being appropriated and used in this state. Thatcher said they don’t have much say but Council has info. There is a committee with Judge McLaughlin and probation. He will stop in to see Auditor so Connie Fromhold can show him how it is being appropriated. And he can attend the committees public meetings. 

ADJOURN- NEXT MEETING IS JULY 5 at 9AM.

Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township

AGENDA- 20 July Dearborn County Commissioners Meeting

 AGENDA

DEARBORN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING

 June 20, 2023 

5:00 p.m. Henry Dearborn Room

Dearborn County Government Center

165 Mary Street, Lawrenceburg, Indiana

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

III. TITLE VI STATEMENT FOR COMPLIANCE

IV. OLD BUSINESS 

V. NEW BUSINESS

• Poll Worker Salaries – Clerk of Courts, Gayle Pennington

• Bid Award for 2023 Line Striping – County Engineer, Todd Listerman

• Zone Map Amendment – Director of Planning & Zoning, Nicole Daily

• Agriculture (A) to Local Business (B-1)
• Ordinance to Change Zoning Classifications of Certain Real Estate

• Review of Interlocal Agreements for Dispatch Services

VI. ADMINISTRATOR – Sue Hayden

VII. AUDITOR – Connie Fromhold

• Legal Rep for Tax Sales – Fee Increase

• Claims/Payroll/Minutes

VIII. ATTORNEY – Andy Baudendistel

IX. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS

X. LATE ARRIVAL INFORMATION

XI. PUBLIC COMMENT

XII. ADJOURN

Notice of proposed zone change to be considered at June 20th Commissioners Meeting

 DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED ZONE MAP AMENDMENT

Notice is hereby given, as required by Indiana Code § 36-7-4-605(f) and pursuant to Indiana Code § 5-14-1.5-5, that the Dearborn County Board of Commissioners will consider a proposed Zone Map Amendment on Tuesday, June 20^th, 2023 at 5:00 P.M. in the Dearborn County Government Center, in the Henry Dearborn Meeting Room (on the first floor of the new building addition), 165 Mary Street, Lawrenceburg, Indiana 47025 on the following:

Request: Zone Map Amendment from Agricultural (A) to Local Business (B1)

Applicant/Owner: Steve Naltner / S&K Investment Properties LLC

Site Address: 7140 Hyland Road, Guilford, Indiana 47022

Parcel Number: 15-02-14-400-017.003-010

Township: Kelso

Size: 3 Acres

Existing Zoning: Agricultural (A)

Dated: June 12, 2023