STATE OF INDIANA IN THE DEARBORN CIRCUIT COURT
Filed SEP -6 -2011 CLERK OF DEARBORN CIRCUIT COURT
CAUSE NO. 151002-1103-FD-084
COUNTY OF DEARBORN
STATE OF INDIANA
VS.
DANIEL BREWINGTON
MOTION IN LIMINE
Comes now the Defendant herein, Daniel Brewington, by Counsel, Bryan E.
Barrett, and moves the Court for an Order in Limine instructing the State of Indiana and
the State's Witnesses to refrain from making any reference whatsoever, directly or
indirectly, during voir dire, opening statement, closing statement, questioning of
witnesses, objections, argument, or at any other time during the trial in any manner
without first obtaining permission of the Court, outside the presence and hearing of the
jury concerning the following:
Any prior misconduct, charged or uncharged, any criminal convictions, or other prior bad acts of Daniel Brewington.
Wherefore, The Defendant, by Counsel respectfully requests the Court grant this Motion In Limine and prays for all other relief just and proper in the premises.
Bryan Barrett
Attorney for Defendant
Indiana Attorney #4325-73
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that A TRUE COPY OF THIS PLEADING HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE Rush County Prosecutor on this 2nd day of September, 2011
Bryan E Barrett
STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE DEARBORN SUPERIOR COURT II
)
COUNTY OF DEARBORN)
)
STATE OF INDIANA )
)
v. )
)
DANIEL BREWINGTON ) CAUSE NO. 15D02-1103-FD-084
MOTION IN LIMINE
Comes now the State of Indiana by F. Aaron Negangard, Prosecuting Attorney
for the Seventh Judicial Circuit, and moves in limine that Defendant, counsel, and
witnesses, be prohibited during voir dire or trial, from mentioning, referring to,
questioning about, or otherwise conveying or attempting to convey to the jury, directly or
indirectly, the following:
1. Any reference the civil action pending in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Indiana under Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-1144SEB-DML.
2. Any medical treatment or medication the Defendant has received while in the
custody of the Dearborn County Law Enforcement Center.
3. Any reference to criminal history or backgrounds of any of State's witnesses
except as permitted under Indiana Rules of Evidence, particularly during voir dire or any
other part of the trial, unless and until such witness has testified. Indiana Rule of
Evidence 608 and 609.
4. Opinions concerning intent, guilt or innocence of the Defendant, the truth or
falsity of the allegations, whether another witness has testified truthfully, or legal
conclusions. See Indiana Rule of Evidence 704(b). Specifically, the State requests the Court to Order Defendant to refrain from asking witnesses whether they believe
Defendant committed the charged offense (or any other similar question).
5. Any alleged witness statements or other evidence not disclosed to the State in
advance of trial, pursuant to this Court's Discovery Order. Hicks v. State, 544 N.E.2d
500 (Ind. 1989).
6. Any affirmative defense that has not been raised or disclosed to the State in
advance of trial, pursuant to statutory or trial rule requirements.
7. Any discussion concerning the penalties Defendant may face if convicted.
"Inasmuch as the jury in a felony case has no sentencing function it should not be
informed as to the range of sentences possible." Wisehart v. State, 484 N.E.2d 949
(Ind. 1985). "These instructions do not contain information concerning a possible
sentence. The Court alone is responsible for sentencing if there is a conviction."
INDIANA PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTION —CRIMINAL — INSTRUCTION NUMBER
13.25.
WHEREFORE, the State of Indiana moves the Court for an order in limine
as to evidence, statements and commentary outlined above.
Respectfully submitted,
F. Aaron Negangard
Prosecuting Attorney
Dearborn County Courthouse
215 West High Street
Lawrenceburg, IN 47025
(812) 537-8884
ISB # 18809-53
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion was served on, Counsel for
Defendant, Bryan Barrett personally or by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, this 19th
day of September, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Looks like the DA doesnt want the jury to know they have done to Dan.
The Prosecutor is not man enough nor does he have the integrity to admit what he has done to this man. In my opinin he is definitely a coward and a bully which is obvious by his continued ridiculous actions. Seems to be a contagious disease in Dearborn Cty. A lot of adult bullies abusing the constitutional rights of citizens. The can strut around town and act lie their very important but they are such losers who have their positions because nobody runs against them and let's face it, how important can somebody really be in a place like Dearorn County. You stay classy all of you politicians!! ha BEVERLY VALENTINE
Did the judge grant this ? If he did come on people !
Talk about completely smothering all the facts...talk about complete removal of pertinent defense...talk about complete trampling of freedom of speech.
WHY has this NOT gone national already? This needs to be put on a national network...doesn't anybody reading this have a connection? This house of cards needs to be brought DOWN...!
Post a Comment