Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Letter from Hilda Jimenez and Tyler Costa Regarding Bright Area Redevelopment Proposal for TIF

  11/7/2024

Hilda J Palacios Jimenez & Tyler Costa

Property: 1772 Jamison Rd. West Harrison, IN

Parcel in question: 15-01 -35-302-004.000-06    (5.4070 acres)


Subject: Concern Regarding Bright Area Redevelopment Proposal

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed redevelopment plan for the Bright area. I recently became aware of this initiative on November 6, 2024, through a social media post. Upon reading the details, I was deeply disturbed by what appears to be a proposal more focused on increasing profits for developers rather than genuinely improving the quality of life for current residents.

What struck me most was the lack of direct communication with those of us who will be most affected by these changes. My property is mentioned in the redevelopment documents, yet I did not receive any formal notification from the authorities or developers regarding how my land would be impacted. This lack of transparency and outreach is disheartening, especially considering that many of us have invested in this community and built our lives here.

I am particularly troubled by the timing of the public meetings related to this proposal, which were held at times when working residents like me would be unable to attend. This appears to be an undemocratic process, where decisions are being made without the meaningful input of those most impacted.

As I reviewed the 34-page document outlining the redevelopment plans, several concerns stood out to me:

  1. Loss of Community Character: The proposal seems to prioritize economic growth over preserving the rural, small-town charm that so many of us love about Bright. Many of us chose to live here for the tranquility, natural beauty, and sense of community. We value the slower pace of life and don’t mind traveling a little further for work in exchange for the peace and beauty of the area. This development threatens to turn Bright into a mini-city, eroding the qualities that made it a desirable place to live in the first place.
  2. Increased Traffic and Strain on Resources: The proposed changes will inevitably lead to more traffic, congestion, and pressure on local resources. These are problems that we are not prepared to handle, and they will diminish the overall quality of life that we currently enjoy.
  3. Property Values and Tax Increases: While the proposal suggests that property values will rise and that new jobs will be created, it fails to consider the financial burden this will place on current residents. If property taxes increase and home values rise, many long-term residents may be forced to sell due to rising costs. Furthermore, for those of us who wish to stay, such changes would make it financially untenable to remain in our homes.
  4. Concerns Regarding My Property: My personal concern is the future of my property. I have worked hard to create a home where I can live in harmony with nature. I have no intention of selling, and I do not wish to see my property taken from me. If I were to sell, I would require a price far beyond what is reasonable, simply to replace the unique environment I have here.

In addition, I would have appreciated a more detailed explanation of how my property is specifically affected by these plans, as well as the options available to me as a homeowner. Learning about these plans via social media, rather than through formal communication, only added to my frustration.

At this point, I urge you to reconsider moving forward with this redevelopment project. While I understand the concerns regarding population growth and the need for housing, I believe there are alternative solutions that can address these issues without compromising the unique qualities of our community. For example, I believe that limiting the number of rental properties owned by individuals and prioritizing local homeowners could help alleviate housing shortages while preserving the area’s character.

In addition, while job creation is important, many residents, myself included, are content to commute to nearby cities for work in exchange for the peace and serenity that Bright offers. The current development plan seems to ignore this balance.

Finally, I respectfully request that you consider leaving my land untouched. I would also like to know whether this redevelopment could require me to seek legal counsel to protect my rights as a property owner. I am prepared to take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that the Bright area retains its charm, sense of community, and quality of life.

I sincerely hope that you will take my concerns into account before making any further decisions. As residents, we deserve better communication, transparency, and consideration for the future of our homes and our community.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Hilda J. Palacios Jimenez

12 November 2024 Dearborn County Redevelopment Meeting Notes

 

12 November 2024 Dearborn County Redevelopment Meeting Notes


Present: Jim Deaton, Chairman, Dave Deddens, Jim Mansfield, Mark Dole in Florida and on the phone for meeting , and Daryl Cutter (non- voting school board member)

ABSENT: Jim Helms


Also present:Sue Hayden, county administrator and minute taker, Andrea Ewan, attorney, Connie Fromhold, Auditor and DCRC treasurer. 

There was a full room this morning. Approximately 60 plus Brights residents were present.

Title VI statement read as legally required.

EXECUTIVE SESSION @ 8:30 a.m. preceded this meeting 

IC §5-14-1.5-6.1(b) (2) (D) which pertains to discussing strategy with the respect to the purchase or lease of real property by the governing body up to the time a contract or option to purchase or lease is executed by the parties;

IC § 5-14-1.5-6.1(b) (4) (A) to discuss interviews and negotiations with industrial or commercial prospects or agents of industrial or commercial prospects by the Indiana economic development corporation, the office of tourism development, the Indiana finance authority, an economic development commission, a local economic development organization (as defined in IC 5-28-11-2(3)), or a governing body of a political subdivision

Order of Agenda May be altered to accommodate advertised time of Public Hearing

 Memorandum for Executive Session- Board 

 Action from Executive Session- ACCEPTED THE CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD CONTRACT FOR TIF 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES-October 8th- APPROVED

CLAIMS AND FINANCIALS

Claims: $3,800.00 to BakerTilly for TIF neutralization and $320.00 to Bayer Becker for 10/8/24 meeting attendance.    Total: $4,120.00- APPROVED 


PUBLIC HEARING 9:10 a.m. - Regarding the Bright Economic Development Plan, Economic Development Area, and Allocation Area

Open Public Hearing- Deaton explained the process about TIF process. First Identify and investigate a need for a TIF, Identify area for the TIF plan. Find out if TIF plan corresponds to the County Master Plan. Then g to Commissioners and see if they approve. We do not talk to teh public until we know we can do it. 

This is the first time we are doing that. This is the first time we are doing it this way- because it is a different kind of TIF. The last thing needed is a confirmation resolution. 

We are a 5 member board and we are appointed by Commissioners and Council- and are all volunteers. 

Deaton - also stated the definition of a TIF district and then showed a diargam of how the TIF works. The increase in tax base after the TIF start date goes to DCRC for use in that TIF. They use it for infrastructure, property , public safety, amenities, incentives and work force development. Ij Bright its s for infrastructure and placemaking. They contacted Becker Bayer to investigate the need and deficiencies. They listed the same ones that are in the study. They are TIFing mainly for infrastructure due to stormwater issues and road deficiencies along Professional Park Drive etc. They are also looking at Placemaking investments like trail widening in the Park, street widening, street lights and crosswalks. The money comes from commercial and industrial development. 

The But/For But for the TIF, his project or investment would not take place. 

The study was done in a small area - but the blue lone area is the area they can spend the money. 

Talked about TIF for 25 years and then taxes go back to the county. He did talk about the entities receiving the property tax 

$48,440 annually will come from this per Baker Tilley Analysis. 

He also showed the increased revenue from the new industries also. 

Then showed what happens with no TIF.

TIF does not increase property taxes per Purdue Research Center. 

Income for day to day in schools does not come from property tax. 

$2.85 million is not obligated o be spent. 

He said it will not increase property taxes. New developments will have nothing to do with that - unless it is something we haven’t seen. Potential investment in the Bright area will increase as people will want to live there as infrastructure and amenities improve. 

The TIF will require them to hire a professional plan for Bright. If you were an incorporated community, you would be doing this- but we are doing it as you are in the county and that is why we are doing this.

Open for Public Comments- 

Patricia Little: Township trustee- this TIF is not in her township. Denise is the Harrison Township Trustee which is in TIF. The TIF flatlines what the township will receive for 25 years. Trustees use this for public safety services etc. So far no TIF money has been used for the trustee services for public safety from the county TIFs. She thinks elected representative should have a seat at the table. This is the 3rd TIF district that goes on Harrison Township. 

Denise- Harrison Township trustee. I just found out about this. She would like to know about this. We have a TIF in West Harrison where Whitewater Mills located. They had to contract with West Harrison to cover that plant for Fire Protection. She talked about why the school board member was on the board but not a trustee.

Chief Fire/EMS Kendall Eberhadt- We only get funding from township trustees for fire. Gross income is $300,000/yr and it does not cover us. There is EMS funding in the new county LIT. We are at a crossroads- our run numbers have increased due to development. 1600 runs last year. Does anyone know what a fore truck costs- $1,000,000. This does not include supplies and tools. We respond to Harrison calls. We are not against the TIF, but we want someone to take notice of fire dept and EMS- since it is on the list of things you can fund include us. <Applause>

Brian DeBruler- Study of CFI Clark County School Corp 2019 speaking to the school funding effects- similar to the Fire Chief’s thoughts.

Drove from Fla to get to this meeting. 2019 - 894 TIFs in the county. Majority operate day cities and towns.Lived in Bright for 52 years. Mansfield and Dole live in Bright. He asked questions regarding property acquisition. No intention to do that per Deaton. Referenced the I-74 corridor study. People say they want more rural area and at some point we will cross over chatline where people no longer see it as an escape a desirable place. Deaton stopped him at 5 months with him being able to come back up later. <Applause>

Deaton said we agree with much that is being said.

Henry Caudill- Tri Township Water District member. Seems like it is a done deal and why have we not been contacted. We spent over $1,000,000 for a new tower. Is this going to take the people’s property? Why were we not aware? 

Deaton- We are not in charge of people moving not Bright and we should not have done this until this point. 

Richard Barnes ( goes by Matt) - Money of $48,000 per year- won’t cover drainage ditches. We are talking about a lot of money that is needed for the plan. There would be have to e a lot of business investment to get the plan done. Then there is police, fire, ems, etc. Taxes - sooner or later- are going to be the answer. Cedes his time to Brian De Bruler.

Deaton- We can only do whatever we can do with what ever have.

Brian De Bruler- The focus of this is to address issues on Professional Park Drive. At Plan Commission for the 12 townhouses proposed there  residents from Memorial Drive and McGrue Drive. At the meeting involving this it was brought up about the optics of having one of the primary people had family and another one from One Dearborn were both the only bidders for the 1 acre property with a plan.  De Bruler said that maybe the community valued the greenspace and not developed. Deaton said that it needs to be mowed and Deddens said the Park was not interested. 

Cutter-School Funding was explained better after De Bruler stated that 150 homes approved in Grubbs Estates and thus there will need more school space. Cutter acknowledged that the property taxes could go for 

Shelly from Merrilees- Where is the property from the road coming from for the road widening? Neither she nor Bob from Auto Center have no property to give. 

Regina from that road also has issues with road widening and asked about all thee xempt people on this property list. Like county lands and churches. 

Man from Bright- did not catch his name- he has sat through Planning meetings over property on that road that HE himself had to pay to fix up road etc. in 2015 to build and now the townhomes are getting TIF so they can build. He set up the entire issue of you saying there is the TIF to fix roads were not tied to the townhouses.He moved to Bright in 2012- and he had thought to buy that townhouse 1 acre because Perleberg told him that it had to start to be built in a 5 month window. He was adamant that this TIF was started because of the townhouses that Perleberg's brother was planning to build.

Jim Mansfield- Said he wants to keep the money up in Bright. That’s why he wants to be on this board. He does not want to incorporate. That would really raise taxes.   

Patricia Little- The DCRC can borrow money against the future TIF money. The hospital office building up there needs this also. 

Deaton- Yes there are ways to get things done. Perleberg reminded him that DCRC has cash on hand. 

Hilda Jimenez read her letter that was previously submitted. She had  outlined all her concerns. <Applause> For the complete letter see the post following these meeting notes. She had sent it as she had to work today- but later decided that this issue was too important and took part of the day off work.

Close Public Comments

Close Public Hearing- Deaton said there would be no vote this morning on this- so most of the public departed for work/home. After they left the board voted to TABLE.

Confirmatory Resolution 2024-DCRC-004 for Bright TIF- TABLED until the next DCRC meeting - which is in December unless they call a special meeting. 


OLD BUSINESS:

2025 Budget for Spending Plan- Perleberg said this has to be done for the state per new law. This is to be filed with DLGF. He worked on it with consultation with Deaton. Approved.

Bayer Becker Update-Working on a task regarding the billboards. Have to work with Wingate and Dyke Industries and DCRC property. Have to get trees trimmed? Approved $5400

Cushman Wakefield Contract- done above after Executive session

NEW BUSINESS:

ONE DEARBORN REPORT:

Stellar Pathways and DCRC Match- $100,000 approved for Bright MeadowsPark coming out of the cash balance fund. Approved. 

Gage Pace- One Dearborn -DCRC Approved getting an appraisal for the 3 acre site on Campus Dr by the hospital.

ATTORNEY’S REPORT- nothing more

OTHER BUSINESS- none

ADJOURNMENT - 11 AM

Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township

Sunday, November 10, 2024

AGENDA- November 25th Dearborn County Plan Commission

 

PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA

 Monday, November 25, 2024 6:00 P.M. 

*Location: Henry Dearborn Meeting Room; 

Dearborn County Government Center 

A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 

B. ROLL CALL 

C. ACTION ON MINUTES—September 23, 2024 

D. OLD BUSINESS – NONE 

E. NEW BUSINESS – 1. Request: Zone Map Amendment from Agriculture Homestead (AH) to Community Business (B-1) Applicant/Owner: AR Engineering / Bradford & Amanda Poorman Site Location: SR 48 Parcel: #15-05-33-200-029.000-019 Township: Manchester Size: 3+/- acres Existing Zoning: Agriculture Homestead (AH)

F. ADMINISTRATIVE

Presentation by OneDearborn for the Harrison Brookville Access Management Plan 

 2025 Meeting Schedule 

Discuss Update to the Comprehensive Plan through 2025

 Review, discuss and recommend changes to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 8—Floodplain Regulations 

 Review and discuss multiple changes to Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations based on new State Code related to development on slopes up to 25%.

AGENDA - November 12th DC Redevelopment Commission Meeting

  AGENDA

DEARBORN COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS MEETING

November 12, 2024

9:00 a.m. 

Dearborn County Government Center

165 Mary Street, Lawrenceburg, Indiana


EXECUTIVE SESSION @ 8:30 a.m. 

IC §5-14-1.5-6.1(b) (2) (D) which pertains to discussing strategy with the respect to the purchase or lease of real property by the governing body up to the time a contract or option to purchase or lease is executed by the parties;

IC § 5-14-1.5-6.1(b) (4) (A) to discuss interviews and negotiations with industrial or commercial prospects or agents of industrial or commercial prospects by the Indiana economic development corporation, the office of tourism development, the Indiana finance authority, an economic development commission, a local economic development organization (as defined in IC 5-28-11-2(3)), or a governing body of a political subdivision


Order of Agenda May be altered to accommodate advertised time of Public Hearing


  1.     Call to order


  1.     Title VI Statement for Compliance 


  1.     Memorandum for Executive Session


  1.     Action from Executive Session
  2.     Approval of Minutes for October 8, 2024 Meeting


  1. Housekeeping
  • Claims: $3,800.00 to BakerTilly for TIF neutralization and $320.00 to Bayer Becker for 10/8/24 meeting attendance.    Total: $4,120.00


  • Financials – Review


PUBLIC HEARING 9:10 a.m. - Regarding the Bright Economic Development Plan, Economic Development Area, and Allocation Area

  • Open Public Hearing
  • Open for Public Comments
  • Close Public Comments
  • Close Public Hearing
  • Confirmatory Resolution 2024-DCRC-004


  1.       Old Business 
  • 2025 Budget for Spending Plan
  • Bayer Becker Update
  • Cushman Wakefield Contract


  1. VIII. New Business


  1.       One Dearborn Report
  • Stellar Pathways and DCRC Match


  1.       Attorney’s Report


  1.       Other Business


  1.       Adjournment

Bright TIF ( Tax Incremental Financing ) District Meeting Nov 12th @ Bright Elementary School


Note: This meeting is occurring AFTER the Nov 12th 9 AM meeting for the Redevelopment Commission. There is a PUBLIC HEARING at that morning meeting to voice your opinion on the actual approval or not for that TIF district. CBM 


Notice of Public Meeting

Dearborn County Redevelopment Commission

Tuesday, November 12, 7:00 p.m.

Bright Elementary School

22593 State Line Road, Lawrenceburg, IN 47025


Purpose of this meeting is to invite the Bright community to discuss community development and economic development in Bright, including establishment of a proposed new tax increment finance (TIF) district to fund these activities.


11/01/2024 DCRC


Thursday, November 07, 2024

7 October 2024 DCRSD Board Meeting Notes

 7 October 2024 DCRSD Board Meeting Notes

Steve Renihan - President, Brett Fehrman - Vice President, Russell Beiersdorfer, Bill Shelton, Jeff Stenger, and Steward Cline 

Board Attorney - Frank Kramer

Also present: Bob and Mike Hrezo and Christy of Hrezo Engineering and Commissioners Thatcher and Probst, and Tamara Taylor, the Beacon. 

ABSENT: Doug Baer

Renihan read the Public Access Statement as legally required.

Minutes: October 17th Minutes- Approved

Treasurers report: none

Public Comment: James Pressler - Guilford -wanting to know what his responsibility is for the costs etc. and if there are laterals for the vacant lateral to the grinder pump etc. Mike Hrezo said they only need to provide the electrical disconnect to the grinder and the pipe to the grinder from the house, and there will be laterals stubbed out to the vacant lots too. Also anything longer than 150ft is the homeowners cost. He also asked about storm water drains and flood plain issues. They directed him to Nicole Daily Planning and Flood Plain and Sandy Whitehead for MS4

Project Updates: 

Guilford- Christy said she got items ready fr invoicing on Guilford. Got a call from lady on SR1 - She is 400 ft further from the end of the line and is planning an Air B&B down there on property across from Pribble. There is no house there now- old one was torn down. The upshot is that the bids were all done, but the lady could pay to extend that line the 400 feet if she wanted it. They know the unit costs and they could pay in advance and then DCRSD would do a change order with the contractor. DCRSD is not going to pay for that as it is beyond the bid work.

Mike Hrezo- there is a strong possibility that Perfects might want to connect to this plant. It might be prudent to put in a casing so that we don’t have to worry about the gas line then. Stenger said that if Perfects signed on that would be a game changer for the plant. Stenger said that he had conversed with Tim Doll about that a year or so ago and Perfects would definitely want to look at that. Mike Hrezo said that the change order would be required like they did with the Taylor property - Perfects would contribute up front. The board was pretty sure DCRSD would not be able to be their sole provider at peak times at the slopes. They would need to have both the current system via Lawrenceburg and Guilford. They will talk to Perfects and Tim Doll.  

High Ridge WWTP - Doug said they had replaced both Ashcraft and Lloyd’s pump. Both running well. The Hensley10812 Texas Gas Rd  pump has a 2nd replacement now. Selling the property. DCRSD board said he needs to get 2 new pumps back so they have spares. And also for 2 people who hadn’t picked up their pumps yet. Per Renihan- Karen Rothan-  9050 address- needs her pump fixed. She will pay for the line that was broken out there. Doug will see to that and get paid.  

High Ridge West Expansion  

Wilson Creek Project

Huesman Rd and Cole Lane

Harrison TIF/Stone Project- Paperwork to have Harrison and DCRSD accept the sewer main extension line at Pear Tree Lane now that it is done. DCRSD motioned to accept it per Kramer’s advice. Approved.

Scenic Ridge/148 Sewers /Outer Drive

Stateline Rd

Serenity Ridge Tranquility Court- 

Moores Hill

Dillsboro

New Business: Renihan brought up the ARPA issue on the contingency funding with an email from Andy Baudendistel. This money  returned after the end of this year it will go back to the Feds. Since they cannot know about the contingency need until after than that. Same idea as discussed at this week’s Commissioner’s meeting. Board agreed that we will lose no ARPA funds and he county gets to use them for Highway dept needs. The Highway dept agrees to refund DCRSD out of their funds for this money. Commie Fromhold - Auditor found this out. Kramer is OK with the contract with the county and the board Approved that. They will get the ARPA  to county highway when the county approves all this and then they will get the money from the highway at that time also. 

Stenger noted that SR1 was reopened and so Jeff Meinders was surprised that the traffic was starting up again as he is excavating. His window of opportunity just closed to get as much work when it was closed done.

Office Update: Mike Hrezo will put up a one page bullet list for each project so Kelly the office to give to residents who agree calling in about the things they need to know. They also need a letter to advise people about how to treat a grinder pump and not flush certain items. 

Claims: There was an adjustment to billing for a new client who assumed the payment plan for an old resident. They agreed to refund her the 2 months, that the deceased owner’s estate paid for.  Approved

Corrections for administrative error that needs a lien to be removed now. Kramer will handle this as it is in his file from Kelly. They will research to see what property this is and revisit it next meeting. There are $1000 credits on the billing over the years. This is the Raymond property. 

Other issues on a duplex where the tenants aren’t paying and the lien went onto the property owner. DCRSD does not bill the tenants.

Adjustments on the rate study bill from operating account to get to the proper accounts. Approved

Normal bills are resuming for Ashcraft (has new pump) and Lloyd (free pump from Chaffee) now that pumps are installed. Approved. 

DCRSD said they need to keep records on these pump situations by name and by address. Maybe a spreadsheet that Kelly can do for this.

Also want a word search in the minutes on Raymond on Mt Tabor to see what actions were taken in the past per Fehrman. 

James Pressler’s info given to Christy to follow up on that from earlier this evening. 

Mike Hrezo - had to explain different items adding to $391,000 and they were trying to track the billing and what was done. [NOTE: Without seeing the sheet trying to describe this for the notes is not clear.] Cline- trying to get all the numbers in the right categories for the records. He thanked Mike for sending the invoices ahead of the evening. Approval of the payment can be tonight and Mike will send the corrections to Kelly. Similar issues with Lake Dilldear. There had been a problem when they changed their billing system with their software supplier.

Mike and board wished Renihan Happy Birthday.

Chris from Barnes and Thornburg called - someone else made an inquiry and he is asking for a 30 day extension to get that in. No proposals have been officially submitted yet. He wants to advertise  more. And there may be 2 total ones to send RFP. They want to push it to Dec 6th. Cline and Beiersdorfer motioned to extend it to Dec 6. Approved. 

Claims all approved and signed from operations exenses.Two of these were approved separately for the 2 ARPA funds claims.  $6332 Lake Dilldear to Hrezo Engineering and $9231 Guilford to Hrezo Engineering.

$86.50 Billing adjustment for Ashcrafty and Lloyd and Adjustment $96.50 for Summer meter program 

Adjourn: After 6:55 PM

Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township