Thursday, July 09, 2026

AGENDA- 27 July 2026 Dearborn County Plan Commission Meeting

 PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA 

Monday, July 27, 2026 6:00 P.M. 

*Location: Dearborn County Government Center 165 Mary Street, Lawrenceburg, IN 47025 

A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 B. ROLL CALL 

C. ACTION ON MINUTES—February 23, 2026 and April 27, 2026 

D. OLD BUSINESS – NONE

E. NEW BUSINESS – 1. Request: Primary Plat for Franklin Subdivision—13 Lot Major Subdivision Request: Waiver on a 100% reduction of sidewalk requirements Applicant: JDJ Surveying and Engineering LLC Owner: Gregory Gavin Site Location: Henderson Road Parcel: 15-01-27-300-007.000-018 Township: Logan Size: 11.778 acres 

F. ADMINISTRATIVE— • Solar Ordinance text amendment—review collected information, citizen comments, legal issues, draft ordinances, etc. • Exhibits to illustrate different suggested development standards on basic properties

ALSO CANCELLED- 16 July 2026 Plan Commission Workshops

 The Solar, Data Center, and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Workshop that was scheduled for Thursday, July 16, has been cancelled.

This decision was made by Planning & Zoning staff with the guidance of the Plan Commission. Following feedback from both the Plan Commission and members of the public, the current priority is to focus solely on proposed amendments to the solar ordinance. Staff is currently developing and evaluating multiple ordinance draft options, and it was determined that holding a workshop at this stage would not be the most productive use of time.

As work on the solar ordinance progresses, additional public workshops will be scheduled later this year to discuss proposed regulations for data centers and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). Those workshops will be held once a more defined draft of the solar ordinance has been completed and the County is prepared to shift its focus to those topics.

We appreciate the continued interest and participation of our residents and encourage the public to stay engaged as these important land use discussions continue.

 

Sincerely,

 

Nicole Daily

Director of Planning and Zoning

Floodplain Administrator

ndaily@dearborncounty.in.gov

T:  812-537-8821  |   F:  812-532-2029

Dearborn County Government Center

Dearborn County Planning and Zoning Department

165 Mary Street

Lawrenceburg, IN 47025

Website: www.dearborncounty.org/planning

 

CANCELLED- 13 July 2026 Dearborn County Redevelopment Meeting

 Jim Deaton, as President of the Dearborn County Redevelopment Commission has sent an email to the board cancelling the Monday, July 13, 2026 meeting.


Sue Hayden
County Adminsitrator
165 Mary Street
Lawrenceburg, IN 47025
(812) 537-8894 (office)
(812) 584-6798 (cell)

Tuesday, July 07, 2026

7 JULY 2026 DEARBORN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING NOTES


 7 JULY 2026 DEARBORN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING NOTES

these notes were taken from the 15 minute meeting video.

 Livestreams can be found @

https://www.youtube.com/@DearbornCountyGov-47025/streams


Present: Duane Bischoff, Acting President, and Kevin Turner


ABSENT: Jim Thatcher and Andy Baudendistel, Attorney


Also present: Connie Fromhold, Auditor and Sue Hayden Administrator


TITLE VI STATEMENT FOR COMPLIANCE was read by Duane Bischoff as legally required.


OLD BUSINESS: Sue Hayden presented- 26 applications turned in by June 30th at the cutoff date for Citizens Advisory Committee. Will address this at next meeting when Commissioner Thatcher is present. They have the lists in their packets. 


NEW BUSINESS


Resolution 2026-009- for Interlocal w/Aurora for George Street Bridge Lights- Tamara Taylor present for her Community Bridge Foundation.  Sue Hayden presented this as Baudendistel was not present. Permanent installation for Aurora . We gave back by having it left there after doing all the engineering done for this. Colors can be changed too. They worked with County Engineer, Todd Listerman regarding Fed regulations.  It will be lit all the time and consulted with Kevin Havlin, the professional lighter. No residents are close to this to be concerned for light issues. Columbus IN  had 7 bridges done- and bridges pics were shown as examples. Approved. 


Interlocal w/Aurora re: lighting on George Street Bridge - Approved


EMS Reimbursement Agreement- They established a fund a few years ago. But many people could not come up with the money for their classes up front. About $250 back then. Jason Sullivan EMA Director has come up with the idea and sat down with Thatcher and Baudendistel so that they would pay the schools up front for this. They have to work for a county contracted EMS squads for at least 3 years or pay back the money on a sliding scale.  Bischoff emphasized this is not just a freebie- they work for the squads here after this. Turner agreed with the premise. Approved


Ratify Signature on 2027 OKI Agreement- Sue Hayden presented- Kevin Turner signed t as OKI rep for the county. Went up about $37 to $17,031 .Approved the ratification. 


Ratify Emergency Declaration - June 18, 2026 storms -Ratified


ADMINISTRATOR- Sue Hayden- nothing more.


AUDITOR – Connie Fromhold  - Covered Bridge Certification $1,850 sent to the county. Approved.


Claims/Payroll and June 16 and June 29 special meeting Minutes- Approved


ATTORNEY – Andy Baudendistel-Absent- Sue presented for him above as needed.


COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Duane Bischoff thanked the county workers who have been working in this heat. Mowing grass too. 


LATE ARRIVAL INFORMATION:none


PUBLIC COMMENT:none


ADJOURN- 9:16 AM


Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township

Saturday, July 04, 2026

AGENDA- 7 July 2026 Dearborn County Commissioners Meeting

 Livestreams can be found @

https://www.youtube.com/@DearbornCountyGov-47025/streams 

AGENDA 

DEARBORN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING 

July 7, 2026

8:30 a.m. Henry Dearborn Room 

Dearborn County Government Center 

165 Mary Street, Lawrenceburg, Indiana


  1. CALL TO ORDER 

 

  1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 

 

  1. TITLE VI STATEMENT FOR COMPLIANCE


  1. OLD BUSINESS


  1. NEW BUSINESS
  • Resolution for Interlocal w/Aurora for George Street Bridge Lights


  • Interlocal w/Aurora re: lighting on George Street Bridge 


  • EMS Reimbursement Agreement


  • Ratify Signature on 2027 OKI Agreement


  • Ratify Emergency Declaration - June 18, 2026 


VI. ADMINISTRATOR – Sue Hayden

VII. AUDITOR – Connie Fromhold

  • Covered Bridge Certification


  • Claims/Payroll/Minutes


VIII. ATTORNEY – Andy Baudendistel 


IX. LATE ARRIVAL INFORMATION 


X. PUBLIC COMMENT


XI. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS  


XII. ADJOURN

Friday, June 26, 2026

Indiana's Definition of Men, Women-








reprinted with permission of IPR- Indiana Policy Review

Indiana's Definition of Men, Women

The binary of male and female is not bigotry. It is the observable, genetically grounded structure of human reproduction and development.

by Dan Eichenberger M.D.

To prevent the further erosion of ordered society, Indiana must take a clear and permanent stand against the Left's campaign to detach law from biological reality. Activists have spent years pressuring institutions to replace objective sex with subjective "gender identity." The General Assembly and voters should amend the state Constitution to codify objective, scientifically grounded definitions of "man" and "woman." Statutory efforts are welcome but remain vulnerable to reinterpretation or reversal by future political pressure. Constitutional language provides the durability our legal and social institutions require.

When the law fails to define sex, confusion spreads wherever sex distinctions matter: athletics, medicine, prisons, schools, shelters and child protection. Policies based on self-identification have produced documented harm, including biological males placed in female facilities, unfair competition in women’s sports and medical records obscuring critical biological information.

These issues arise from substituting ideology for biology. Most Americans, including many Hoosiers, support retaining birth sex as the basis for legal categories like identification and athletics. Public policy should reflect these commonsense views rather than the demands of a narrow activist movement.

Indiana can anchor its law in reproductive biology. Human sex is defined by the role an organism is organized to perform in reproduction, specifically the production of one of two gametes: eggs or sperm. There is no third gamete and no continuum of sex categories.Woman: An adult human organized around the production, storage and delivery of eggs and the capacity for gestation.
Man: An adult human organized around the production and delivery of sperm.

These definitions describe developmental pathways set from conception and observable throughout life. Sex is not arbitrarily assigned or socially constructed; it reflects biological organization.

It is commonly said that XX equals female and XY equals male. While usually accurate, this framing is incomplete. Chromosomes are indicators, but genes ultimately determine sexual development.

The SRY gene (typically located on the Y chromosome) initiates male development by triggering the formation of testes, hormone production, and male anatomy. When SRY is absent or nonfunctional, development proceeds along the female pathway.

Rare genetic conditions illustrate this principle:XX male (De la Chapelle syndrome): SRY is present on an X chromosome, leading to male development.
XY female (Swyer syndrome): SRY is absent or inactive, resulting in female development.

These conditions do not create additional sexes; they are exceptions within the same binary framework. Individuals with atypical chromosomes (such as XXY or XYY) still develop along male or female pathways. Disorders of sex development (DSDs) are medical conditions requiring accurate diagnosis: not evidence that sex is a spectrum.

For rare situations where sex classification is unclear or challenged, Indiana can adopt a consistent, evidencebased process:Phenotypic assessment: Evaluate external anatomy and, if necessary, internal reproductive structures using ultrasound or other techniques.
Genetic analysis: Conduct chromosomal testing and confirm the presence and function of key genes such as SRY.

This approach addresses complexity without abandoning biological reality. It ensures individuals receive appropriate care while maintaining coherent legal categories.

Indiana's recent legislative efforts correctly advanced statutory definitions that tie sex to biological characteristics at birth (gametes, anatomy, and hormones oriented toward reproduction) while rejecting subjective identity as a legal category. I was honored to provide input on a Senate measure and to work with our legislators on this critical issue. These steps represent meaningful progress.

However, statutes can be amended by simple majorities, reinterpreted by state agencies or overturned by courts responding to cultural or political shifts. Activists have shown they will continue pressing until they succeed. A constitutional amendment requires broader consensus and raises the bar for any future reversal. It places biological reality into the state's foundational document alongside protections for life, liberty and property. It sends a clear message: Indiana will not surrender the meaning of "man" and "woman" to ideological pressure or activist redefinition.

Clear constitutional definitions provide practical protections that affect daily life:Fairness in sports: Female athletes retain meaningful competition and scholarship opportunities instead of losing them to biological males.
Safety in single-sex spaces: Prisons, shelters and facilities can maintain sex-based policies grounded in objective biology rather than self-declaration, preventing the documented harms seen in other states.
Medical accuracy: Healthcare providers keep clear biological data for screening, treatment, drug dosing and research, unobscured by ideological terminology that can confuse care.
Protection for children: Policy reinforces that sex is observed at birth based on biology, not arbitrarily assigned. This helps counter social and medical transition pressures on minors.
Legal and linguistic stability: Ends compelled speech, reduces endless litigation over basic categories, and stops the administrative chaos of constantly shifting definitions driven by political trends.

The Indiana General Assembly should propose a constitutional amendment stating that for all purposes under state law:

• "Woman" and "man" carry the biological meanings defined above;

• Sex is binary; and

• Any determination of sex in ambiguous cases shall follow the phenotypic and genetic protocol described.

The amendment should further specify that these categories exist independent of an individual's psychological, behavioral, social or subjective experience.

This language is precise, defensible and faithful to both science and reality. It avoids the strategic error of resting the entire case on chromosomes alone while still providing an objective, testable standard that resists efforts to blur every distinction. Claims that “trans women” or “trans men” represent new biological or ontological categories have no basis in science. A biological male who identifies as a woman remains biologically male, and vice versa. Better terminology would be a feminized male or masculinized female. Gender identity does not alter fundamental reproductive biology or developmental ontology.

Indiana has a genuine opportunity to lead. By codifying these definitions, we affirm that law must track biological reality rather than reshape it to accommodate ideological demands from gender activists. We protect women's hard-won sex-based rights, ensure fairness for female athletes, maintain safety in vulnerable spaces, and preserve medical integrity. Most importantly, we refuse to lie to children about the nature of their own bodies.

The binary of male and female is not bigotry. It is the observable, genetically grounded structure of human reproduction and development. The campaign to portray it as optional or oppressive is an attack on truth itself. Codifying biological reality is not cruelty: it is the basic responsibility of a self-governing people who value truth, fairness and the well-being of future generations.

The time to act is now. Indiana's constitution should reflect biological reality, not transient cultural fashion pushed by activists. Our children, our women, and the integrity of our institutions deserve nothing less.

Dan Eichenberger, M.D., an adjunct scholar of the Indiana Policy Review Foundation, is an Indiana native with 30 years experience as a primary care physician, physician executive and healthcare consultant. He is the recipient of the Indiana University Southeast Chancellors Medallion.

The Indiana Policy Review Foundation is a nonprofit education foundation focused on state and municipal issues. It is free of outside control by any individual, organization or group. It exists solely to conduct and distribute research on Indiana issues. Opinions expressed in signed articles do not necessarily represent the views of the editors, the Indiana Policy Review Foundation, or its board of directors. Nothing in this journal, whether in print or pixels, is an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill or influence the election of any candidate.





follow on Twitter | friend on Facebook

Copyright © 2026 Indiana Policy Review Foundation, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this message because you subscribe to the journal or the web site.

Our mailing address is:

Indiana Policy Review Foundation
PO Box 5166Fort Wayne, IN 46849




Wednesday, June 24, 2026

COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC NOTICE REGARDING A QUORUM to ATTEND SUNMAN TOWN HALL MEETING THURSDAY 25 JUNE 2026

 PUBLIC NOTICE


Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the Dearborn County Board of

Commissioners may be present at a Town Hall Meeting on Thursday, June

25, 2026, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Sunman American Legion Post

412, Eastern Avenue, Sunman, Indiana.

This is not a meeting of the Dearborn County Board of Commissioners and

no formal action will be taken by the Commissioners during this event;

however, the Commissioners would be "receiving information" at the Town

Hall Meeting, which would constitute "official action."

This notice is provided as required by the Indiana Open Door Law.

Monday, June 22, 2026

22 June 2026 Dearborn County Plan Commission Meeting Notes`

 

22 June 2026 Dearborn County Plan Commission Meeting Notes`

Present: Dennis Kraus, Jr., Chairman, Sabrina Gregory, Mark Lehman, Jake Hoog, Dan Lansing, and Jim Thatcher. 

ABSENT: Joe Vogel, Russell Beiersdorfer, and Eric Lang.

Also Present:  Nicole Daily, Planning and Zoning Director, and Andy Baudendistel, Attorney.

Baudendistel read the Title VI statement as legally required.

ACTION ON MINUTES- none

OLD BUSINESS:none

NEW BUSINESS: none

ADMINISTRATIVE Nicole Daily presented. 

Staff will give an overview of information, comments and other items collected towards the goal of amending ordinances related to commercial solar, BESS and Data Centers. All information and comments gathered that will be presented has been collected up to June 19th, 2026.

In the PC Board packet: Article 19 as it exists today, Ch 13 of MS4 technical standards (may be changed to these) Setbacks and draft ordinances that were put out at workshop, definitions intent etc. Also surveys and survey results that are received to date. These are all here for the board to review. 

  Time for the Board to ask questions of staff of any information and comments gathered 

Staff will present item standards and/or processes that have been debated through the public input over the last several months. There are several listed and it is not guaranteed that all topics will be discussed. It will be dependent on the time before a new topic is discussed. 

  • The Plan Commission will give its recommendations/guidance to staff on the standard of choice but it will not be an official vote of the final nature of the standard. Final votes will not be taken until the ordinances have been completely written at future meetings. 

Mark Lehman- asked about missing info on fire issues and water supplies for that. Nothing in the ordinance on that right now. 

Jim Thatcher- remember they did have that discussed.- but it is not there.

Daily said they have discussed some security and safety codes with the EMA director meetings. 

Jake Hoog asked about specialized equipment that might be needed. 

Daily said they have talked about an economic development agreement to address that.

Jake Hoog- Are there any limits on the acreages that are described for each type of Solar BESS  etc.

Sabrina Gregory- asked about screening for the developments and stormwater calculations etc. 

Daily comments on MS4 and engineer calculations.

Sabrina Gregory - said they should mention that plants suggested should be perennials.  

Daily brought up comments on overlay districts, conditional uses or special exceptions for audience comments to be opened up. 

Jillian Collins- setback standards- wants a 1500 ft setbacks for non participating  neighbors- it has been set in several counties as well as 1200 and 1000 acres. Wants an increased focus on standards around data centers. Wants a similar amount of effort for this centers. Just because the state is offering record breaking incentives for these- we should not have to follow suit. She asked if there has been an applicant for a hyper scale data center here. Kraus Jr has no knowledge of anyone applying yet. We have no ordinance data centers yet.

Constantine Komosis- wanted to discuss safety and with the hundreds of millions of dollars spent here and there are thousands of battered kids, women etc close here. My Savior says a liar is worse than a thief and challenges Linnea. He left right after that statement.

Michelle Dudley- lifelong resident. Supports 1500 ft set back and a strong noise ordinance. She read a statement from a woman in Georgia who is less than 1500 ft from a solar farm. Developers would say that pure tones, low frequency vibrations, etc. do travel further. Brooks County learned this. They County cited them for violating the noise ordinance. We banned hand held testing- require an ambient noise testing- and test the setback. Kay Howard is the woman from Georgia.

Amanda Thompson- asked when they got their packets- ( tonight) Some surveys were not working right and could not select multiple answers when that was an option. Staff has tried to fix that when told. Asked if the comments were public. Yes they will add more. Fire and EMS- Manpower has been hard to get- thinks Harrison FD is doing a fantastic job. Equipment needed is different. Thermal imaging cameras needed, some units $3k each, She listed several certain equipment that we do not even have. Rural counties needing $100k-$200k. Go stay next to one of these and see if you can stand it for 2 weeks before you ask us to accept this.

Robert Rauen- Listed several counties that require 1500, 1300, and 1000ft setbacks. They recommend 1500 ft. Several counties mandate a solar overlay district. Many counties limit the amount of farm land used to 5%, 1%, just a few acres, 50 acres, and Henry County complete ban. Our recommendation - Max is 200 acres and no more than 1% on prime farmland. Decommission bond  requirements were detailed. Local ordinances often cap noise at the property line. No noise on a consistent basis from ambient noise, height of panels 10 ft max.

Jessica Schneider- Manchester - we are on Weisberg. Decibels can trigger or cause PTSD. In my family is a Vietnam Vet that will be affected by this construction. Also said she did a speech about the cost of fire and EMS and please respect the taxpayer money.

Jim Red Elk- wanted to talk about communication. He senses that most people do not understand this process and how the county works. The worksheets are about little details and the public is worried about bigger things. Many counties do not permit solar or BESS or Data Centers. Is that an option here? Wants to improve communication. 

Amy Johnson- Are you guys hiring a consultant to write the ordinance? No. Are there other projects besides the Manchester one? Not that they know of- unless it is in the boundaries of the cities or towns. 

Dennis Rutenshroer?- I was approached for solar- and they wanted to clearcut trees. My brother and I farm all around there. 2.5 million acres. I would rather eat my meal at candlelight.

Ed Shelton- thinks the cost of fire etc should be borne by the developer. The water infrastructure is not out there. Head water or North Hogan and Head water of Tanners Creek. That needs to be considered. The decommissioning needs to put up a pile of money by the developer - for tornadoes etc too. 

Joe Calans?-  A Dollar General was shot down out here by BZA- but why is this big thing 100 times the size of it -being acceptable. He was part of 3 big solar farms including Sardinia. And the crews and the big trucks are not being considered. Either Sunman or up SR48. Looking at them after they are running is one thing. While they are being built is a big deal. Took a year and half. Huge parking lots just for tech employees constructing. 

Jim Thatcher said there would have to be agreements on the road traffic and wear and tear- with the state.

Joe Volk-has been helping Jefferson County out with their Data center. He has been feeding the info to Bobby Rauen and tech Solar Group. There is nothing green about a solar farm. They have pallets ground up etc….

Dave Samms- Manchester- How does a resident in Manchester get anything out of this? The tax on the property? The land owner is leasing it- does he pay the property tax? Kraus Jr.- The land is taxed on USE by the assessor. Solar would be a commercial use. So taxed as that. Dave Samms- How will the property sales go if people want to leave? What is the value to anybody other then the ones getting paid. He said the commissioners will have the final say. Due to state law change- they don’t have to do what PC recommends. 

Joe Bulach- The heights - I’d like to see cattle under these. 10 ft is too short. Doesn’t think sheep will even fit. 

Bobby Rauen- There is an exception for agrivoltaics. For height change.

Sam Mortenson- vegetation and setbacks-arborvitae etc. Size of plant and also the amount of water to grow bigger plants.

Brian Smith- we raise bison. Sheep carry something that kills bison. Arborvitae is susceptible to deer. 

Scott Becker- Paramedic in St Leon and Colerain. Consider water supple- consider the staffing. Four inch water main won’t cut it. Can St E handle the construction crew injuries etc.I would question if any of the city of our EMS and fire can handle this build out. 

Joe Volk- regarding animals underneath. Ask the death rate of the animals- chewing on the wires. Could short it out. This was form a guy on site. Thinks the tax situation needs to be looked into further. Definitely look at the fine print on this. Use dot do farm rate  and shift dot commercial rate in Germany per the Wolferts. 

Lisa? All for the 1500 setback and wants to add more. We need to be smaller scale. And we should be hiring locals for this- not illegals. ICE would be in. Does not want it though.

Joe Bulach- There are a bunch of sheep already in that area. 

Sabrina Gregory -Browsers vs grazers. Goats vs sheep but sheep will browse too. 

Chris Mueller- research shows that erosion control is why the 10 ft height on solar array is considered good.

Josh Holland- Sparta Township- thinks this is a capitalistic society should put the solar in river cities. ( Lawrenceburg Greendale and Aurora) This would help for the conservancy district levee system too. Use the AEP site. 

CLOSE PUBLIC DISCUSSION. 

Daily- they are working with HWY Dept on road usage agreements. They also require an escrow account to pay a consultant the PC hires to help with the applications. Like they do for cell towers. She will ask Meghan Acra ( Assessor) about the property tax questions. 

Mark Lehman- End result of overlay district and special exception is a 2 part process. They are looking at he character pf the land. It’s almost the same process. They have to be a unique and special situation to be accepted. Daily - Conditional use lets you put conditions on them- you get into the nitty gritty of the details. Rezone does not require that. 

Lansing- Is there a minimum amount of acreage? Looking at the 1500 ft setback and what it looks like in reality. Daily- trying times NOT look at project- so it’s not site specific when we do the ordinance.  

Gregory- limiting the amount of timber to be removed from property? Daily- yes and also percentage of prime farmland maps.  

Hoog- wants to see maximum acreage for solar.Like 200 acres?  Lansing- also have to look at setbacks. Could have 200 acres but it does NOT include the setback- as it’s not solar panels.

Thatcher- Do a graphic with acreage and show the setbacks and how much total acreage that takes up.

Lehman- want to be careful about too much setback.This would consume more farms. Like the cluster development idea.  

Overlay District through a Rezone process or Conditional Use through the Board of Zoning Appeals - Discussion about what an overlay district really is- It’s not in state planning code. It’s a local creation per Baudendistel. 

Other considerations on agenda were:  

Types of projects and definitions which projects require special approvals  

Landscaping only verses Berms/rolling mounds for buffering or a mix. 

Should it be required on all yards (front, side and rear) or only along the roadways. 

Can existing vegetation be counted. Should a landscape bond be required. 

Other setbacks—residential wells, accessory structures, schools, commercial property, industrial property 

Leased property notification to the public and notification to the Planning and Zoning Office. Notification to property owners and tenants. 

Agrivoltaics—should it be required or highly suggested or used for mitigation of approval 

Decommissioning bond amount 120%, 150% or more for solar, BESS, and Data Centers.

Board wants to have a draft ordinance by August meeting. They also want an additional zoning district instead of an overlay maybe? 

Board had no further questions for now. 

Meeting adjourned at 8:20  PM

Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township

Sunday, June 21, 2026

AGENDA- June 26,2026 Plan Commission - UNOFFICIAL MEETING OUTLINE

 

DRAFT / UNOFFICAL PLAN COMMISSIN MEETING OUTLINE June 22, 2026 

The following outline is a preliminary draft designed to provide structure for the meeting. The timing and speakers are tentative and open for discussion and refinement. 

A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 

B. ROLL CALL 

C. ACTION ON MINUTES— February 23, 2026 and April 27, 2026. 

E. OLD BUSINESS – NONE 

F. NEW BUSINESS – 

G. ADMINISTRATIVE— ➢ Staff will give an overview of information, comments and other items collected towards the goal of amending ordinances related to commercial solar, BESS and Data Centers. All information and comments gathered that will be presented has been collected up to June 19th , 2026.

 ➢ Time for the Board to ask questions of staff of any information and comments gathered 

➢ Staff will present item standards and/or processes that have been debated through the public input over the last several months. There are several listed and it is not guaranteed that all topics will be discussed. It will be dependent on the time before a new topic is discussed. 

➢ The Plan Commission will give its recommendations/guidance to staff on the standard of choice but it will not be an official vote of the final nature of the standard. Final votes will not be taken until the ordinances have been completely written at future meetings. 

Outline for each Topic 

➢ Staff will give a brief introduction of each topic, information gathered and any additional research. 

➢ Plan Commission will open the meeting to public comments only on the topic at that time. Each person shall have 3 minutes to give their recommendations/concerns/opinions. If there is a representative of a group, that will  have to be announced prior to talking and the length will be determined by the Plan Commission. 

➢ Plan Commission to close public comments. Plan Commission to discuss and give a recommendation or multiple recommendations to staff on the standard of choice to move forward with drafting an ordinance/standard on the topic.

 ➢ Depending on the outcome of the vote, will depend on the following topics discussed. 

These topics are mainly going to relate to Solar during this meeting. They can be the same for all three types of projects if the Plan Commission decides: 

o Board Approvals for solar, BESS and Data Centers projects—

Overlay District through a Rezone process or Conditional Use through the Board of Zoning Appeals 

o Types of projects and definitions which projects require special approvals 

o Setbacks front, rear, side and from residential dwelling units if the zoning is not industrial 

o Landscaping only verses Berms/rolling mounds for buffering or a mix. 

Should it be required on all yards (front, side and rear) or only along the roadways. 

Can existing vegetation be counted. S

hould a landscape bond be required. 

o Other setbacks—residential wells, accessory structures, schools, commercial property, industrial property 

o Leased property notification to the public and notification to the Planning and Zoning Office. Notification to property owners and tenants. 

o Agrivoltaics—should it be required or highly suggested or used for mitigation of approval 

o Decommissioning bond amount 120%, 150% or more for solar, BESS, and Data Centers 

➢ No new topics will be discussed after 10:00pm. 

If topics are not discussed they will be moved to the top of the list 

➢ Adjourn Meeting.