- Call to order
- Actions of Executive Session
- Approval of Minutes
- Claims & Financials
- Unfinished Business
- New Business
- Economic Development Officer’s Report
- Attorney’s Report
- Other Business
Welcome to the quest for better citizenship!
Have something you want to submit?
Comments are open but there is An Old Rule you may have missed.
If gossip, verbal fisticuffs, and hyperbole are more to your tastes try Dearborn County IN - Public Forum Conversation board
RETHINKING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
reprinted with permission of IPR
A 'Florida' Vacation?
by Jason Arp
Being a city councilman in a medium-sized city, you are going to come across the writings of Dr. Richard Florida in one way or another. Real estate developers, Chambers of Commerce heads and politicians of all stripes have learned that Florida’s concept of “quality of place” translates into big bucks at the taxpayers’ expense. The best-selling author, however, has recently done an about-face that might signal a change in the appetite of city governments for urban renewal projects.
Florida is a professor of a particular niche of economics labeled “urban studies,” which is sort of an economic geography and public-policy amalgamation. In his 2002 work, “The Rise of the Creative Class,” he posited that in order for a city to be prosperous, particularly its urban core, it needed to attract the type of people who will make it so.
Florida divides the world into three basic classes: service-industry workers (retail, restaurants, call centers); blue-collar workers (manufacturing, mechanical, construction); and creatives (“knowledge workers,” “techies” and “artists”).
Presumably, the category “knowledge workers” includes bankers, attorneys, architects and doctors as well as painters and videographers. The essence of “The Rise of the Creative Class” was that the right kind of urban growth would only happen in places that attract and retain members of the creative class. In order to attract and retain these talented people, cities must look and act more like San Francisco or New York.
And for the last 15 years cities across the United States have been trying to do just that — recreate themselves to meet the criteria that Florida laid out as having a vibrant “quality of place.” Florida defines that as having the right kind of restaurants, a music scene and lots of stuff to do. This he associates with population density and a certain je ne sais quoi that attracts younger, hipper people. As a result, cities and states spent billions trying to use the Florida Model to reverse a five-decade flow of people to the suburbs.
The clamor to capture Dr. Florida’s creative class has been the impetus for ever-escalating budgets of redevelopment commissions and community-development departments in city governments nationwide. Tax increment financing (TIF) of downtown apartment complexes became the norm. Florida inspired the creation of regional development authorities and other special-purpose entities. In short, the Florida Model has been a boon to the so-called economic development industry by adding straight-up, public works-type financing to private construction projects, an area previously limited to tax abatement and incentives to individual companies.
But Dr. Florida’s most recent book, “The New Urban Crisis,” can be described as a mea culpa. As data came in from the past decade and a half of re-urbanization, Florida began to see that the people who benefited from his plan were the wealthy, while the poor and middle class suffered. The unintended result, he now writes, was “something that conferred a disproportionate share of its benefits on a small group of places and people.”
But the more startling revelation is the admission that only his previously identified “super-star cities” and “knowledge hubs” actually saw any benefit from his recommendations. Indeed, only a couple of dozen cities showed any benefit whatsoever from catering to his formula, and the great number of those were the cities on which “The Rise of the Creative Class” was modeled. The Florida Model, in other words, fits only the Florida Model.
Dr. Florida, the authority in city planning departments across America, now is saying that Pittsburgh, where he labored as a professor at Carnagie Mellon for 20 years, cannot after all compete with Boston for talent. And that is so despite building a state-of-the-art convention center and two gleaming stadiums. In fact, as a result of what he describes as “winner-take-all urbanism,” places like Pittsburgh — or Indianapolis, or Evansville or Fort Wayne, for that matter — need not apply.
This new policy position likely ends Dr. Florida’s own superstar status in American economic-development circles. His offering the white flag on turning Topeka into San Francisco, while long overdue, is a surrender that will not please his crony capitalist fan club. There is simply too much money left on the table.
Chasing the golden chalice of the creative types has provided a lucrative industry for savvy developers. In my city, downtown apartment buildings complete with posh bars and restaurants are being constructed with public money (to be owned privately, of course) all in the name of attracting the right kind people.
These deals (yes, there are more than one) are done on the most outrageously uneconomic terms, averaging $275,000 a unit in a city where the average single-family home is priced at $100,000. If you discount the projected future cash flows (rents less expenses) of these operations at a reasonable rate, say six percent, their value would be typically a third of their financed costs. That means the government is paying three times what it should for something that it then gives away to “equity” investors.
“The curse of the creative class,” to borrow the phrase of Steven Malanga, a Manhattan Institute scholar, is that cities now have an elusive goal that can never be measured or even precisely defined, a goal they nonetheless spend hundreds of billions to pursue.
As a result, the “quality of place” rationale justifies practically any project anywhere — riverfront promenades, extensive bike trails, apartments, entertainment districts — as long as it requires massive amounts of public financing.
Dr. Florida’s “new urban crisis” is a crisis for sure, but one of his own making.
Jason Arp, a financial consultant, represents the 4th District on the Fort Wayne City Council. He wrote this for the Indiana Policy Review Foundation.
Richard Florida. The New Urban Crises: Gentrification, Housing Bubbles, Growing Inequality, and What We Can Do about It. S.l.: Oneworld Publications, 2017.
Florida. The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
Steve Malanga. “The Curse of the Creative Class,” City Journal, winter 2004. (Retrieved from https://www.city-journal.org/
To marshal the best thought on governmental, economic and educational issues at the state and municipal levels. We seek to accomplish this in ways that:
EXALT the truths of the Declaration of Independence, especially as they apply to the interrelated freedoms of religion, property and speech.
EMPHASIZE the primacy of the individual in addressing public concerns.
RECOGNIZE that equality of opportunity is sacrificed in pursuit of equality of results.
Indiana Policy Review Foundation
RENEWALFrom the South Wall | "Dollars to the Classroom"; "A Move to Ensure the Bicentennial Legacy"; "Educators in an Era of 'Fake' News" (Neal).
Update your preferences and payment options here to get your password for 2017.
It's easy, sign up here.
Cover | "Christianity in a Civic Society" (Gard); "The Political Christian" (Schansberg); "The Unraveling" (Lantz) "Politics and the Third Commandment" (Volmerding).
Special Report | "A Covenant for Young Men in Trouble" (Heath).
Social Division | "Whose Lives Matter?" (McGowan); Framing the News" (Modisette); "An Education in Polarization" (Berkowitz).
Book Review | "Listen, Liberal" by Thomas Frank (Schansberg).
Backgrounders | Webster, Pickerill, Schansberg, Huston, Arp, Ladwig, Watts, Van Cott, Cummins, Bohanon, Harper.
The Indiana Policy Review Foundation is a non-profit education foundation focused on state and municipal issues. It is free of outside control by any individual, organization or group. It exists solely to conduct and distribute research on Indiana issues. Nothing written here is to be construed as reflecting the views of the Indiana Policy Review Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before the legislature or to further any political campaign.
The desktop version of the most recent journal can be shared directly by clicking the social-network icon at the upper left of the PageTurnPro tool bar of a particular issue. And the journal can be read, searched or forwarded from an iPad, iPhone or other hand-held device through this mobile version.