Wednesday, May 09, 2012

22 May 2012 Council Agenda






AGENDA

DEARBORN COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, May 22, 2012

6:30 p.m., Commissioners Room
County Administration Building
215 B West High Street, Lawrenceburg, Indiana
           

I.              PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

II.             CALL TO ORDER 

III.            SURVEYOR – Dennis Kraus, Jr – Fee schedule for sale of plat book 

IV.           SHERIFF – Mike Kreinhop
Gasoline
Approval to hire replacement deputy sheriff
JAIL – Mike Kreinhop
Inmate Meals

V.            SPECIAL OLYMPICS INDIANA – Gregory Townsend 

VI.           HIGHWAY – Todd Listerman / Tim Greive

Equipment - $420,000.00

Resurface - $1,300,000.00 (Weisburg, Lake Tambo, Benning)

Slip Repair - $775,000.00 (West Laughery, Hogan Hill, N. Dearborn Road)

Lower Dillsboro Bridge Replacement - $300,000.00

Line Striping - $100,000.00


VII.          VETERANS SERVICE OFFICE – Mike Burgess – Soldier Burial Fund  

VIII.         PROSECUTOR – Aaron Negangard – Professional Witness Fees 

IX.           COMMISSIONERS – Jeff Hughes - Hoosier Square Building

X.            ADJOURN






TEA Party Meets May 10th- Public Welcome

What: We the Hoosiers – General Meeting
When: Thursday – May 10, 2012 at 6:30 P.M.


Where:  Depot Room of the Lawrenceburg Public Library
             High & Mary Street
             Lawrenceburg, Indiana
Please join us this Thursday evening for a very important and Informative talk that can afffect all of our lives. We need to be informed. Please come.!
What is Agenda 21? And how it could change America
An initiative of the United Nations, Agenda 21 is a program designed to drastically alter the way of life as Americans know it today. Dwight Lile is the featured speaker at the May 10 meeting of We The Hoosiers. Mr. Lile will explain Agenda 21, including its tenets of redistribution of wealth, environmental regulations, how Agenda 21 will impact our state and local governments, what losses we risk and what can be done about it.
Mr. Lile is a small business owner residing in Carmel, IN. He is a husband, father, and grandfather of four. He is a Tea Party advocate and a co-founder of The Constitutional Patriots, a group of citizens who meet in the tri-county area of Marion, Boone, and Hamilton Counties.
We The Hoosiers is a local Tea Party group that meets the 2nd Thursday of each month in the Depot Room of the Lawrenceburg Public Library. The meeting begins at 6:30pm.
Check our websitewww.wethehoosiers.com

Best Mailer from the Primary Election


Among all the negative ads in the mailbox came a regular sized postcard this week that can't help but make you smile.

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

PRIMARY ELECTION RESULTS FOR LOCAL CANDIDATES

PRIMARY ELECTION RESULTS FOR LOCAL CANDIDATES
DEMOCRAT PRIMARY BALLOT LOCAL CANDIDATES 2012

Rudy M. Howard, Jr. -Clerk of Courts - 980

Philip Darling- Commissioner D-1- 957

Tom Orschell- Commissioner D-2 (Incumbent)- 1048

John Johnson- Council –at- large ( vote for no more than 3)- not on ballot until Nov

N.Alan Miller,III- Judge of Superior 2 - 1045



REPUBLICAN PRIMARY BALLOT LOCAL CANDIDATES 2012

Rick Probst- Clerk of Courts-4066

Kevin J. Lynch – Commissioner- D-1- 4014

Arthur Little – Commissioner D-2 - 4070

CORONER- Vote for 1:

Steven P. Callahan – 1733- TOP VOTE

Sue Dudgeon- 1684

William (Bill) Steiner- 1139

Michael Walterman- 233

COUNCIL –AT-LARGE – Vote for no more than 3:

Maynard Barrett  (Incumbent)- 2051 Lowest Vote does NOT go on to Nov.

Charles D Keyes- 2252

Randy Lyness - 2956

William (Bill) Ullrich (Incumbent)- 2886

SURVEYOR – Vote for 1:

Dennis Kraus, Jr. (Incumbent)- 3208

Roger Woodfill - 1541

COUNTRY TREASURER- Vote for 1:

Barbara J. Kaffenberger- 2362

Philip D. Weaver- 2633

Sally A Blankenship- Judge of Superior 2 (Incumbent)- 4298

6th Congressional District Republican Convention Delegates – vote for no more than 17

Maynard Barrett- 2098

Craig E Beckley- 1871

Mary L Carrell- 1513

Tom Carrell-1455

Allen W. Goodman-1832

Martin W (Marty) Hon-1660

Vickie L Hon-1477

Judith (Judie) Howard-1422

Jeff L. Hughes-2579

Stephanie B Libbert-1486

Arthur Little- 2113

Patricia Little-1691

 Ruth Ann Little- 1595

Bryan Messmore-2405

Aaron Negangard-2738

Matthew M Neuendorf-1385- Bottom 4- not delegate

Alex Parniuk-1153 Bottom 4- not delegate

Fred Schmits-1661

Mark Siemers-1413

Jay R Smith-1235-Bottom 4-not delegate

Angela S Swomley-1262- Bottom 4- not delegate
STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 2010 AUDIT DINGS PROSECUTOR LEGAL EXPENSES AND COUNCIL'S DONATIONS OF RIVERBOAT MONEY

PROSECUTOR:


TO: THE OFFICIALS OF DEARBORN COUNTY

We have audited the records of the County Prosecuting Attorney for the period from January 1,

2010 to December 31, 2010, and certify that the records and accountability for cash and other assets are

satisfactory to the best of our knowledge and belief, except as stated in the Audit Result and Comment.

The financial transactions of this office are reflected in the Annual Report of Dearborn County for the year

2010.

STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS

July 27, 2011


COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

DEARBORN COUNTY

AUDIT RESULT AND COMMENT

LEGAL SERVICES RELATED TO DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

A payment to Bose, McKinney, and Evans in the amount of $23,828.53 was made on December

23, 2010. The invoice presented for examination showed the payment was for legal services in connection

with "Matter 022105-0001 2009 Disciplinary Grievance." The legal services were on behalf of Frank

Aaron Negangard, Prosecuting Attorney, in connection with a disciplinary grievance filed with the

Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Indiana.

No Home Rule Ordinance providing the conditions authorizing the County to pay the cost of legal

services in connection with a professional disciplinary matter was presented for audit.

Indiana Code 36-1-3-6 states in part:

"(a) If there is a constitutional or statutory provision requiring a specific manner for exercising

a power, a unit wanting to exercise the power must do so in that manner.

(b) If there is no constitutional or statutory provision requiring a specific manner for

exercising a power, a unit wanting to exercise the power must either:

(1) if the unit is a county or municipality, adopt an ordinance prescribing a specific

manner for exercising the power; . . .

(3) comply with a statutory provision permitting a specific manner for exercising the

power.

(c) An ordinance under subsection (b)(1) must be adopted as follows:

(1) In a municipality, by the legislative body of the municipality.

(2) In a county subject to IC 36-2-3.5 or IC 36-3-1, by the legislative body of the

county.

(3) In any other county, by the executive of the county. . . ."

Payments or transfers which are not authorized by statute, ordinance, resolution, or court order

must be reimbursed or transferred to the proper fund. (Accounting and Uniform Compliance Guidelines

Manual for Counties of Indiana, Chapter 1)

Public funds may not be used to pay for personal items or for expenses which do not relate to the

functions and purposes of the governmental unit. Any personal expenses paid by the governmental entity

may be the personal obligation of the responsible official or employee. (Accounting and Uniform

Compliance Guidelines Manual for Counties of Indiana, Chapter 1)

County officials will be requested on the next audit to present for audit a Home Rule Ordinance

providing a specific manner authorizing the payment of legal services in connection with a job related

professional disciplinary matter.


COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

DEARBORN COUNTY

EXIT CONFERENCE

The contents of this report were discussed on July 27, 2011, with Frank Aaron Negangard,

Prosecuting Attorney.
( Note- this was also in the Council and the Commissioner's audit reports and discussed with them at their respective exit conferences 3 months later in October 2011.)

COUNCIL:
COUNTY COUNCIL
DEARBORN COUNTY
AUDIT RESULT(S) AND COMMENT(S)
DONATIONS OF RIVERBOAT ADMISSION TAX FUNDS
The County receives admission taxes derived from a riverboat gaming facility. In 2010, the
County gave $1,864,893 of riverboat admissions tax to various governmental entities pursuant to revenue
sharing agreements. The County also donated $372,978 of riverboat admissions taxes to various not-for profit organizations.
Indiana Code 4-33-12 (Admission Taxes) does not contain provisions authorizing a county to
enter into agreements with units of local government to share a County's share of admission taxes.
Governmental funds should not be donated or given to other organizations, individuals, or governmental
units unless specifically authorized by statute. (Accounting and Uniform Compliance Guidelines
Manual for Counties of Indiana, Chapter 1)
A similar comment was reported in the prior Reports B31158, B32742, B34942, and B37354.
DONATIONS OF RIVERBOAT REVENUE SHARING FUNDS
The County receives riverboat revenue sharing funds from the City of Lawrenceburg. In 2010,
the County donated $189,849 of riverboat funds to various not-for-profit organizations
Indiana Code 36-1-8-9(a) states:
"Each unit that receives:
(1) tax revenue under IC 4-33-12-6 or IC 4-33-13;
(2) revenue under an agreement to share the tax revenue receive under IC 4-33-12 or IC
4- 3-13 by another unit; or
(3) revenue under a development agreement (as defined in section 9.5 of this chapter);
may establish a riverboat fund. Money in the fund may be used for any legal or corporate
purpose of the unit."
This statute does not authorize a county to make donations from the fund.
Governmental funds should not be donated or given to other organizations, individuals, or governmental
units unless specifically authorized by statute. (Accounting and Uniform Compliance Guidelines
Manual for Counties in Indiana, Chapter 1)
A similar comment was reported in the prior Reports B31158, B32742, B34942, and B37354.

COUNTY COUNCIL
DEARBORN COUNTY
EXIT CONFERENCE
The contents of this report were discussed on June 20, 2011, with Maynard Barrett, Vice
President of the County Council, and Gayle L. Pennington, Auditor

Thursday, May 03, 2012

PROSECUTOR'S LETTER TO COMMISSIONERS STATING HIS OPINION OF THE ORDINANCE AND STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS AUDIT

F. AARON NEGANGARD
Prosecuting Attorney

812/537-8884 Telephone
812/537-4295 Fax 

7th Judicial Circuit
Dearborn and Ohio Counties
Courthouse
215 West High Sheet
Lawrenceburg Indiana 47025


May 1, 2012

Dearborn County Commissioners
Administration Building
Lawrenceburg IN, 47025

Re: Home Rule Ordinance Pertaining to 2010
Invoice# 505680 

Dear Gentlemen: 

This letter is to inform the Board of Commissioner that I have reviewed the Home Rule Ordinance pertaining to 2010 Invoice# 505680 prepared by County Attorney
Andrew Baudendistel. I approve of and support the passing of this ordinance. The
disciplinary grievance was filed as a result of my employment both as a deputy prosecutor, chief deputy prosecutor, and prosecutor of Dearborn and Ohio Counties of Indiana. The fact that this process can be abused by those who have been accused of crimes and those seeking political retribution is unfortunate. However, to not protect those who serve the county from these types of complaints would encourage prosecutors to not stand up for justice and the public safety of our community for fear of such retribution. Such a policy would not be in the best interests of the citizens of Dearborn County. 

It is also my opinion the passage of this Home Rule Ordinance is not necessary.The State Board of Accounts finding is clearly in error. A review of the statute clearly states that an ordinance needs to be passed authorizing the appropriate expenditures.There was an ordinance in place at the time. That ordinance has since been amended and clearly authorizes elected officials to enter into and pay for service contracts out of appropriated funds. That is what happened in this case. Nevertheless, there is not a process by which this dispute could be litigated for a final decision. As such, the State Board of Accounts has requested that this ordinance be passed. For these reasons, despite my opinion that such an ordinance is not necessary, I would support  the Commissioners passing this ordinance so that they can move on to more important issues for the citizens of Dearborn County. 

Thank you for your time. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,
F.Aaron Negangard,
Prosecuting Attorney

FAN:mlm
HOME RULE ORDINANCE PASSED BY COMMISSIONERS ONLY FOR THE PAYMENT OF A SINGLE CLAIM FOR ONE OF THE PROSECUTOR'S DISCIPLINARY GRIEVANCES


ORDINANCE 2012--_____ 

HOME RULE ORDINANCE PERTAINING

TO 2010 INVOICE #505680


            A “Home Rule” Ordinance pertaining to 2010 Invoice #505680; 

            WHEREAS, Dearborn County Prosecuting Attorney, F. Aaron Negangard, presented a claim on December 14, 2010 to Dearborn County Council for payment of legal fees in the amount of $23,828.53 to Bose McKinney & Evans for legal representation in connection with “Matter 022105-0001 2009 Disciplinary Grievance”; 

            WHEREAS, Dearborn County Council approved the payment of the claim and said claim was, in turn, approved by the Dearborn County Board of Commissioners;           

            WHEREAS, Indiana Code §36-1-3-5(a) states that “Except as provided in subsection (b), a unit may exercise any power it has to the extent that the power:  (1) is not expressly denied by the Indiana Constitution or by statute…”; 

WHEREAS, Indiana Code §36-1-3-6(b)(1) states that “If there is no constitutional or statutory provision requiring a specific manner for exercising a power, a unit wanting to exercise the power must, if the unit is a county or municipality, adopt an ordinance prescribing a specific manner for exercising the power”; 

WHEREAS, Indiana Code §36-1-3-6(c)(3) states that “An ordinance under subsection (b)(1) must be adopted as follows:  In any other county, by the executive of the county”; 

            WHEREAS, payment of the claim is not expressly denied by the Indiana Constitution or by statute;

            WHEREAS, there is no constitutional or statutory provision requiring a specific manner for payment of the claim; and 

            WHEREAS, pursuant to the Indiana Code, payment of the claim was at the discretion of the Dearborn County Council, however, the Dearborn County Board of Commissioners must pass an ordinance pursuant to the exercise of this discretionary decision of Dearborn County Council.           

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: 

            Payment of 2010 Invoice #505680 is hereby authorized pursuant to the Indiana “Home Rule” statutes, specifically, Indiana Code §36-1-3-6(b)(1) and §36-1-3-6(c)(3).  Payment of this claim is not expressly denied by the Indiana Constitution or by statute and the power to pay this claim, therefore, was duly exercised at the discretion of Dearborn County Council pursuant to Indiana Code §36-1-3-5(a).           

ALL OF WHICH IS ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Dearborn County, Indiana this the 1st_ day of _May_, 2012. 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA 

JEFF HUGHES, President     

TOM ORSCHELL, Member
                                                                                                                                                                                            SHANE MCHENRY, Member 

ATTEST:

GAYLE PENNINGTON

County Auditor
STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS AUDIT OF  PAYMENT FOR PROSECUTOR'S DISCIPLINARY GRIEVANCE LEGAL FEES

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEARBORN COUNTY 

AUDIT RESULT AND COMMENT 
LEGAL SERVICES RELATED TO DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS


A payment to Bose, McKinney, and Evans in the amount of $23,828.53 was made on December 23, 2010. The invoice presented for examination showed the payment was for legal services in connection with "Matter 022105-00012009 Disciplinary Grievance." The legal serviceS were on behalf of Frank Aaron Negangard, Prosecuting Attorney, in connection with a disciplinary grievance filed Disciplinary with the Commission of the Supreme Court of lndiana. 

No Home Rule ordinance providing the conditions authorizing the County to pay the cost of legal services in connection with a professional disciplinary matter was presented for audit. 

lndiana Code 36-'1-3-6 states in part: 

"(a) lf there is a constitutional or statutory provision requiring a specific manner for exercising a power, a unit  wanting to exercise the power must do so in that manner. 

(b) lf there is no constitutional or statutory provision requiring a specific manner for

exercising a power, a unit wanting to exercise the power must either: 

(1) if the unit is a county or municipality, adopt an ordinance prescribing a specific

manner for exercising the power; . . . 

(3) comply with a statutory provision permitting a specific manner for exercising the

power. 

(c) An ordinance under subsection (b)(1) must be adopted as follows: 

(1) ln a municipality, by the legislative body of the municipality.

(2) ln a county subject to lC 36-2-3.5 or lC 36-3-1, by the legislative body of the

county.

(3) ln any other county, by the executive of the county. . . .', 


Payments or transfers which are not authorized by statute, ordinance, resolution, or court order must be reimbursed or transferred to the proper fund. (Accounting and Uniform Compliance Guidelines Manual for Counties of lndiana, Chapter 1) 

Public funds may not be used to pay for personal items or for expenses which do not relate to the functions and purposes of the governmental unit. Any personal expenses paid by the governmental entity may be the personal obligation of the responsible official or employee. (Accounting and Uniform Compliance Guidelines Manual for Counties of lndiana, Chapter 1) 

County officials will be requested on the next audit to present for audit a Home Rule Ordinance providing a specific manner authorizing the payment of legal services in connection with a job related professional disciplinary matter.

Tuesday, May 01, 2012

1 May 2012 Dearborn County Commissioners Meeting Notes


1 May 2012 Dearborn County Commissioners Meeting Notes

Present: Jeff Hughes, President, Tom Orschell, and Shane McHenry

Also present: Gayle Pennington, Auditor, Teresa Randall, County Administrator, and Andy Baudendistel, Attorney.

Executive session on April  26th- personnel policy- no decision

OLD BUSINESS:

Agreement with HVL Officers, Sheriff’s Office and HVL POA- Baudendistel reviewed and worked up an automobile lease agreement at a nominal fee so they can get their liability to cover it. Commissioners gave permission to Sheriff Kreinhop to meet with Donna Lask of HVL POA to sign them and then he will return with them to the commissioners.

Payroll Schedule Change- Tabled until June 5 meeting- remains tabled

NEW BUSINESS:

Ratify Signatures on Grant Proposal for the Prosecutor/SCU- Commissioners ratified Hughes’s signature on a grant proposal for $9,079 for a GPS tracking device.

Signatures for SE Regional Community Corrections Grant- Pennington said that this was time sensitive and Hughes said this would help with jail overcrowding. Baudendistel had reviewed it and had no problems with it.  Orschell noted this was a year contract. Commissioners approved this for fiscal year 2012-13 for $499,417.

Home Rule Ordinance- Baudendistel said this ordinance deals with the claim that paid for Prosecutor Aaron Negangard’s own disciplinary grievance attorney fees approved by Council in December of 2010 and officially paid by Commissioners in early 2011. Commissioners passed- this ordinance and said it is situation specific and ONLY refers to the Negangard payment- in order to MAKE IT LEGAL per State Board of Accounts. Hughes asked to have the response in the minutes- State Board of accounts reviewed this and said they had to have an ordinance in effect in order for this to be valid. [NOTE: This seems backwards.  Just how does this work really? The Council in Dec 2010 approves the transfer of funds to pay for an attorney that handled Negangard’s disciplinary grievance, then Commissioners later in early 2011 sign off on the claim. When questioned about it, it takes weeks for Baudendistel to “research” it and he comes back with – it’s legal because of Home Rule. And yet no one invoked Home Rule at any time in Council or Commissioners meetings on this over a year ago. Then the State Board of Accounts comes in and says they had to have an ordinance on Home Rule for this to be legal. So they make one up AFTER THE FACT- in fact- LONG AFTER THE FACT- and sign off on it. This can’t be really right….]

Bridge #34 Discussions- Bridge 34 is being replaced now and Bridge 29 will be next and Mr. Irwin said his agreement only referenced Bridge 34- to use his ROW NOT Bridge 29. There is an old school building there, his original agreement was from 2004. It was to be on a one year basis – not a 5 year basis. The last offer in October 2011 addressed some of Irwin’s issues per Baudendistel. The county is buying the use of the land for 5 years Baudendistel said- not leasing it.  Orschell said he would sit down with Irwin and Listerman to iron this out. Irwin agreed and they will set up a date to discuss this. Baudendistel asked to know when this is also so he can address it all in the agreement.

Joseph Williams – Kennels/Wiring at Old Animal Shelter for a 4H Project- Hughes said this has been on the back burner until PAWS took over. Williams wants to purchase as much as he can get out of there. He is trying to raise money for his 4H project. Hughes reminded them that Park Board is looking at the area for the septic facilities. Williams will use the kennels and wiring for fund raising. Baudendistel said they need to check with PAWS first. McHenry said they should donate these items to 4H and them they can give it to Joseph Williams. Orschell will meet with him out there. No decision yet.

Gary Steinmetz- Wessler and Bittner Roads- He is representing concerned residents there in the northern part of the county. They want their roads paved. They have a dust problem and there is a traffic problem on a road that is almost like  a cow path. Gravel costs and ship seal and labor for patching etc seem to be enough to cover the costs of paving. Snow plowing removes the gravel each winter. In an effort to convince the commissioners of their sincerity, they got a petition together.  Steinmetz gave the commissioners a copy. They have waited 10 years for this. Carol Wessler also spoke about her road. These two roads are north of New Alsace off Legion Road in Kelso Township. Six families live on Wessler Road. Fed-ex comes by twice a day. She said they were promised that riverboat money would go for roads. She said when they asked for votes for the gambling boat- they didn’t say- except for dead end roads. Orschell said he had to be honest- he didn’t see their road getting paved. He did say they are looking at using the grindings to pave some roads. Steinmetz said the roads are so narrow they have to back up to the next driveway to pass. It needs to be widened. To do them correctly would take $100,000 without widening or putting in culverts per Tim Grieve. Hughes asked where they were on the replacement schedule. Grieve said they were way down on the list. Carol Wessler reminded the commissioners that county residents voted for that boat.  She’s been there 50 years and she’s getting old- she’d like to see this done. Grieve said they have had slips that are soaking up money. FEMA money hasn’t all come in yet. McHenry suggested they contact Barnes and Thornburg lobbyists to see about getting more money for roads. McHenry asked for contact information so they could stay in contact about this. Council needs to be asked as well.

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: Todd Listerman, Highway Engineer- not present.

Tim Grieve, Highway Superintendent- Nothing new to add from last meeting. They are trying to identify roads for chip seal. Even the good roads like SR 52 need upkeep. We need a definite highway paving program. Grieve is not crazy about chip seal- but it does preserve the road. Some are using slag for chip seal and not limestone.

ADMINISTRATOR: Teresa Randall- received  a request for a proclamation from CASA and Donna Thacker. This is for Mental Health Awareness month- May. Commissioners signed this proclamation.

Bill Black EMA requested they sign for district 9 task force work to be covered by the county’s worker’s comp. Randall presented this for him and commissioners signed off on it.

RFPs are coming in on the drainage issues at Hoosier Square- she will have this for next meeting.

Construction Manager (Jail Project)- Selection Process- Bill Shelton- Building Inspector, has reviewed the RFQ’s with her. Randall presented a PowerPoint of how this selection process was set up. She felt that this was an important decision. They sent an unbiased team to visit each firm at their offices.  The team was Randall and Shelton. They developed a comprehensive list of questions for all firms. They met key personnel for each firm. There were 6 firms. These interviews were several hours each. They tallied the scores to get the top 3 individually and compared with each other and come to agreement. Experience, values, location, record keeping.

Shireman,CCI, Envoy, PMSI, Skillman, and Maxwell. Maxwell , Shireman, and PMSI were the top 3.  They narrowed this to Maxwell and Shireman.

Maxwell has consulting relationship with Integrus. They have wide correctional facility background. They also will be responsive as they are in the county.

Shireman also had equally good scores. Randall said that having a local firm would be entrenched in the local job market.  Additionally they are county taxpayers and would act in the county’s best interest.

Shelton said that he likes the fact that both companies had construction experience.  Randall said that she hadn’t expected it to be as emotionally difficult to make these evaluations.

She is looking for a motion to give her permission to begin negotiations for a Professional Services contract with the firm they choose and the contract will be discussed and submitted for possible approval at the next meeting.

Hughes went over his history on the jail briefly. Randall said that she thought that Integrus the firm Maxwell has a consultant relationship with has national contacts and they might be able to help answer concerns with the project and tap into ideas that others have use. [NOTE: Integrus Architecture has main offices in Washington and one in Carmel IN.] Orschell said that they didn’t expect her and Bill Shelton to criss-cross the state for 800 miles to get all this info. He was pleased with their efforts. McHenry agreed with the other commissioners. Randall said that she wanted to get this done before Council meets in May. Hughes wanted to know if the others wanted to interview the top two also. McHenry said he was ready tonight. Orschell said he thought Randall and Shelton were a neutral set of eyes. Randall said she appreciated the commissioners going outside the box and allowing them to evaluate this way – creatively.

Commissioners ALL voted to give Randall permission to begin negotiations with Maxwell Construction. Orschell thanked all the companies who participated in this. He knew they were all qualified.

AUDITOR: Gayle Pennington- minutes for April 17th approved.

Pennington also showed 65,146 requests for info on their Beacon GIS site.

 Assignment of the tax sale certificate to Moores Hill needed to be signed. She wanted  an amount on it- they decided $0. Baudendistel worked with Watson( Moores Hill’s atty) Commissioners signed the tax certificate over to Moores Hill. Quit claim deeds were being prepared by Watson for owners with an interest in the Brown Building. No public commented at the public hearing.

Claims were signed.

ATTORNEY: Andy Baudendistel- The dispute with Frick and Associates has been settled from 2011. They still need to sign the agreement.

Condemnation for Stateline ROW is now down to 2 pieces of property and set for court hearings. Hughes asked what the issues were with those owners. Negotiations can go on even though the condemnation suit has been filed. Baudendistel did not know if they even had attorneys. Hughes wants to be sure we looked at every option on these owners.

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: none

LATE ARRIVAL INFORMATION- none

PUBLIC COMMENT: one resident of Wessler and Bitner Roads said- Boy you spent a lot of money tonight!

Mike Raftery- here as a concerned parent. This year Destination Imagination won Globals. 27 students hope to go to Tennessee for this in June. They have no money to get them all there. Cost is $635 per kid. They have done some fund raisers. They are asking for support to go to Lawrenceburg for money. They may be our future leaders. Commissioners gave a letter of support for them to go to Lawrenceburg Council. Baudendistel suggested going to Legions, Eagles, Kiwanis, etc.

Meeting adjourned at 8:05 PM

Christine Brauer Mueller

Lawrenceburg Township

Monday, April 30, 2012


Campaign Finance Reports for the Primary

Before you vote, take a peak into local candidate’s purses.

Three reports were filed late: Randy Lyness April 25, Michael Walterman April 23, and Art Little April 23.

Two were missing: Charles Keyes and Roger Woodfill. Bill Steiner picked up his forms to file as I was leaving the Clerks Office with this data on April 30.

COMMISSIONER:

Tom Orschell- Collected and spent $0  

Philip Darling- Contributed himself $1376.13 spent $2765.52 with balance owed of $1380.89 

Art Little- Contributed himself $5000 spent $2360.33 +$250.89 unitemized with balance of $2433.78 

Kevin Lynch- $797 unitemized contributions + $3051 itemized as below:

Robert Bucher- $500

Brian Lynch- $200

John Maxwell- $100

David Ertel- $100

Chip Perfect- $100

Ellen Perfect- $100

Mark Williams- $250

Brad Plummer- $200

Sheryl Haag- $200

William Schmarr- $100

David Lorey- $100

Richard Butler- $101

Jeff Hughes $100

Hrezo Engineering- $200

Perfect North Slopes- $500

DPBG Political Action Committee ( American  Structurepoint Engineering)- $500

Culbertson Property Management- $100

Lynch Imports- $100

Lynch spent $3311.56 itemized and $134.18 unitemized.  Balance was $402.26

His itemized expenditures included $100 to American Cancer Society and $200 to the Children’s Advocacy Center.

COUNCIL:

Randy Lyness- had $3227.82 cash on hand from a previous campaign??, spent $666 with a balance of $2561.82 

John Johnson-collected and spent $0 

Bill Ullrich- collected $750 unitemized , spent $694.69 with a balance of $55.31 

Maynard Barrett- contributed himself $2274.50, spent $2086.64 with a balance of $187.86 

Charles Keyes has not filed a report yet. 

CORONER:
Steve Callahan- Contributed $2500 himslef + jeff Hughes $100 for total of $2600. He spent $1632.26 with a balance of $467.74 

Sue Dudgeon- contributions include herself for $1900, Noel McHenry for $200 and $175 unitemized. She spent $1657.70 with a balance of $617.30 

Mike Walterman- contributed and spent $0

Bill Steiner is completing his form today.

TREASURER:

Barb Kaffenberger- Donated $2500 herself, spent $1824.40 with a balance of $675.60 

Phil Weaver- Donated $1722.04 himself, spent $1686.50 itemized plus $35.54 unitemized with a balance of $0 

CLERK:

Richard Probst- Has $2400 from donors below:

Sharon Probst- $1000

Richard Probst- $1000

Patricia Probst- $200

Edward L Probst- $200

He spent $1720.10 itemized plus $227 unitemized with a balance of $452.90


Rudy Howard- Has $505 contributed from Martha Mettee, spent $72.76 with a balance of $432.34 

SURVEYOR:

Dennis Kraus Jr.- Contributed $1067.29 himself + Cliff Bischoff $200. He spent $1267.29 with a balance of $0. 

Roger Woodfill has not filed a report. 

JUDGE SUPERIOR COURT 2:

Sally Blankenship- Raised $4788.92 itemized below and unitemized $842

Jim Thatcher-$500

Jason and Jennifer Lyness- $500

Andrea Merkel- $575.42

Sally Blankenship $592 + $2621.50

She spent $3196.92 + $92 unitemized leaving a balance of $2434


Alan Miller- Raised $2268.08 + $516.80 itemized below + $495 + $305.99 unitemized:

Thomas w and Mary Jo Heintz- $200

Norman and Anna Miller- $400

Jackalope Printing- $168.08

Alan and Clarajohn Freemond- $500

Alan Miller- $500

Doug Garner-$500

Alan Miller- $516.80

He spent $1373.76 +$816.80 itemized + $159.41 unitemized, leaving a balance of $1235.90.